Main difficulties identified in chemistry learning: a literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17765/2176-9192.2025v27e12955Keywords:
BNCC, Chemistry Learning, Educational Difficulties, High School, Pedagogical StrategiesAbstract
This article offers an integrative review of national and international academic literature aimed at identifying, in a more detailed and systematic way, the main difficulties faced by high school students in learning Chemistry. The research is strongly grounded in official Brazilian documents, especially the Brazilian National Common Curricular Base (BNCC – Brazil, 2018), considering the need to articulate theory and pedagogical practice. Furthermore, it robustly explores the inclusion and exclusion criteria used in studies addressing learning difficulties, highlighting how fragmented publications can compromise the synthesis of findings. Conceptual, affective, and methodological barriers are analyzed, emphasizing the influence of misconceptions, academic anxiety, and the disconnection between content and real-world application contexts. In line with BNCC recommendations, the text develops an expanded overview of pedagogical interventions – from active methodologies and digital technologies to gamification – presenting empirical evidence of their effectiveness. Finally, contributions for teachers’ continuing education and suggestions for future research are discussed, aiming to provide support for educators to align their practices with official guidelines and overcome identified barriers.
References
ALENCAR, L. A.; PEREIRA, F. A. Jogo de tabuleiro como ferramenta para ensino de propriedades periódicas. Revista de Química Educacional, v. 15, n. 2, p. 112–128, 2021.
BENNETT, J.; LUBBEN, F. Context-based Chemistry: The Salters approach. International Journal of Science Education, v. 28, n. 9, p. 999–1015, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702496.
BISHOP, J. L.; VERLEGER, M. A. The Flipped Classroom: A survey of the research. In: Proceedings of the 120th American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2013. p. 1–18.
BRASIL. Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais: Ciências. Brasília: MEC/SEF, 1997.
BRASIL. Base Nacional Comum Curricular: Ensino Médio. Brasília: Ministério da Educação, 2018.
COSTA, M. A.; PIMENTEL, G. M. Concepções equivocadas de ligação química em estudantes do Ensino Médio: um estudo em São Paulo. Revista Eletrônica de Educação, v. 9, n. 3, p. 45–58, 2015.
COSTA, R. F.; SOUSA, P. W. Implementação do Flipped Classroom no ensino de cinética química em Pernambuco. Anais do Congresso Brasileiro de Ensino de Química, v. 22, p. 250–263, 2019.
CONSELHO NACIONAL DE EDUCAÇÃO – CNE. Resolução CNE/CEB nº 3, de 6 de dezembro de 2018. Diretrizes para a organização do Ensino Médio no Brasil, 2018.
FERREIRA, A. et al. Promoting sustainability awareness through chemistry education: A Brazilian perspective aligned with the BNCC. Journal of Science Education, v. 39, n. 15, p. 2027–2045, 2017.
FROTA, L. T.; ALMEIDA, V. M.; CARVALHO, S. R. Reducing barriers in chemistry education through teacher collaboration: A case in Minas Gerais. Brazilian Journal of Science Education, v. 17, n. 2, p. 89–110, 2021.
GABEL, D. Improving teaching and learning through chemistry education: The case for Context-based Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, v. 76, n. 4, p. 548–554, 1999.
HARRISON, A. G.; TREAGUST, D. F. Conceptual change using analogias e modelos: Six case studies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 37, n. 7, p. 784–821, 2000.
JOHNSTONE, A. H. Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, v. 7, n. 2, p. 75–83, 1991.
LYTHCOTT, J. Problem-solving and requisite knowledge of chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, v. 67, n. 3, p. 248–252, 1990.
NAKHLEH, M. B. Why some students don’t learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, v. 69, n. 3, p. 191–196, 1992.
NIAZ, M. Enhancing problem-solving skills in chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 37, n. 3, p. 342–347, 2000.
OSBORNE, J.; COLLINS, S. Pupils’ views of the role and value of science in the school curriculum: A focus on science in secondary schools. International Journal of Science Education, v. 23, n. 5, p. 441–467, 2001.
OZMEN, H. A study on students’ misconceptions of mole concept and stoichiometry in Turkey. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, v. 5, n. 1, p. 54–65, 2004.
POZO-SECO, A.; RIAÑO-REINA, M. Misconceptions about atomic structure: A cross-cultural study in Colombia. International Journal of Science Education, v. 40, n. 12, p. 1442–1460, 2018.
QUINTANA, C. et al. Project-based learning in chemistry: Effects on student conceptual understanding and motivation. Science Education and Technology, v. 28, n. 4, p. 345–358, 2019.
RODRIGUES, P. et al. The impact of advanced scientific calculators on student performance in stoichiometry. Journal of Chemical Education, v. 97, n. 7, p. 1805–1811, 2020.
RODRIGUES, T. et al. Use of augmented reality in the teaching of acid–base titration. Journal of Chemical Education, v. 95, n. 9, p. 1627–1630, 2018.
SILVA, M. et al. Educational games in chemistry: An innovative approach to reduce student anxiety. Journal of Chemical Education, v. 96, n. 6, p. 1245–1250, 2019.
TABER, K. S. Chemical Misconceptions: Prevention, Diagnosis and Cure. London: Royal Society of Chemistry, 2002.
TREAGUST, D. F.; DUIT, R.; FRASER, B. J. Improving Teaching and Learning in Science and Mathematics. New York: Teachers College Press, 2003.
WENGER, E. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Iniciação Científica Cesumar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Editorial Board is authorized to make certain changes in the original text to comply with bibliographical norms, orthography and grammar, so that standards in language and style may be maintained. However, the author´s style will be preserved. The concepts developed by the authors are their exclusive concern and responsibility.In case of approval, the e-mail of acceptance will contain a Letter of Copyright with authors´ name, personal data, and signature of all authors.




