A MEETING OF GIANTS: PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES AND U.S. WEB BROWSERS IN 2016

  • Thiago Perez Bernardes de Moraes Università Degli Studi di Messina (UNIME) Centro Universitário Campos de Andrade (UNIANDRADE)
Keywords: Presidential debates, 2016 elections, Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, Internet

Abstract

Election debates in the USA have a great impact on the population. In spite of their difference from other types of political communication, debates in the USA give the people an opportunity for a ‘direct meeting’ with the candidates. Current analysis verifies whether debates in the 2016 presidential election affected web browsers with regard to further information on the candidates. Three hypotheses are taken into account: (I) due to the great audience at the debates, Trump and Clinton may have had their visibility enlarged; (II) debates do not boost interest by web browsers for the candidates for vice-president; (III) since post-debate research showed that Clinton “won” the three debates, she, rather than Trump, may have had her visibility enlarged because of the debates. Results reveal that 25% of search for candidates for the presidency by web browsers may be attributed to the debates, corroborating the first hypothesis. There is no mathematical co-relationship between search due to debates and search for candidates for the vice-presidency, corroborating the second hypothesis. The third hypothesis was jointly adherent since the effect of the debate (as an independent variable) was slightly more significant to underscore search for the candidate Hilary Clinton by web browsers.

Author Biography

Thiago Perez Bernardes de Moraes, Università Degli Studi di Messina (UNIME) Centro Universitário Campos de Andrade (UNIANDRADE)
Pós-doutorando em Direito Constitucional pelo Dipartimento di Giurisprudenza da Università Degli Studi di Messina (UNIME). Doutor em psicologia social pela Universidad Argentina John Fitzgerald Kennedy (UAJFK) e professor no Centro Universitário Campos de Andrade (UNIANDRADE).

References

ABRAMOWITZ, A. I. The impact of a presidential debate on voter rationality. American Journal of Political Science, p. 680-690, 1978. Disponível em: <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2110467 > Acesso em: 13 out. 2016.

ANDRÉ, J. G. 2016: A longa caminhada: das eleições primárias à sucessão de Obama. Relações Internacionais (R: I), n. 51, p. 27-41, 2016. Disponível em: <http://www.scielo.mec.pt/pdf/ri/n51/n51a03.pdf > Acesso em 12 Dez. 2016.

CHERKAOUI, M. Clinton versus Trump: Two-Distant Visions for America. Al Jazeera Centre For Studies, p.17, 2016. Disponível em: <http://studies.aljazeera.net/mritems/Documents/2016/8/23/67a0ed56cc4c4ed187c23ae03d677930_100.pdf > Acesso em 07 Dez. 2016.

DESAI, A. R. Social Background Of Indian Nationalism. Popular Prakashan, 2005.

ELIOPOULOS, G. M. et al. The use and interpretation of quasi-experimental studies in infectious diseases. Clinical Infectious Diseases, v. 38, n. 11, p. 1586-1591, 2004. Disponível em: <http://ai2-s2-pdfs.s3.amazonaws.com/30e5/ea376960ea9c1291d222619199032d6d5813.pdf> Acesso em 19 Nov. 2016.

ELRICK, K. Ironic feminism: Rhetorical critique in satirical news. 2016. Tese de Doutorado. Clemson University. Disponível em: <http://tigerprints.clemson.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2849&context=all_dissertations> Acesso em 13 Jan. 2017.

KOLLANYI, B.; HOWARD, P. N.; WOOLLEY, S. C. Bots and automation over Twitter during the first US Presidential debate. COMPROP Data Memo, 2016. Disponível em: < https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3144967/Trump-Clinton-Bots-Data.pdf > Acesso em 14 Nov. 2016.

KRAUS, S. Televised presidential debates and public policy. Routledge, 2013.

LEE, J.; LIM, Y. Gendered campaign tweets: The cases of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Public Relations Review, v. 42, n. 5, p. 849-855, 2016. Disponível em: < http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811116302053 > Acesso em 12 Dez. 2016.

LIEVEN, A. Clinton and Trump: Two Faces of American Nationalism. Survival, v. 58, n. 5, p. 7-22, 2016. Disponível em: < https://www.iiss.org/-/media/silos/survival/2016/survival--global-politics-and-strategy-october-november-2016/58-5-02-lieven/58-5-02-lieven.pdf> Acesso em 18 Dez. 2016.

MAGDY, W.; DARWISH, K. Trump vs. Hillary Analyzing Viral Tweets during US Presidential Elections 2016. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.01655, 2016. Disponível em: < https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.01655> Acesso em 12 Dez. 2016.

MATHER, R. D.; JEFFERSON, K. W. The Authoritarian Voter? The Psychology and Values of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders Support. Journal of Scientific Psychology, p. 1-8, 2016. Disponível em: <http://www.socialautomaticity.net/images/JSP_May_2016.pdf> Acesso em 13 Out. 2016.

MORAES, T. P. B. et al. Mulheres, política e sub-representação. Um estudo sobre a correlação entre qualidade da democracia, ideologia e mulheres nos parlamentos. Derecho y Cambio Social, v. 11, n. 36, p. 32, 2014. Disponível em: < https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/5472577.pdf > Acesso em 15 Out. 2016.

MORAES, T. P. B. Newspapers and Elections: An Empirical Study on the Relationship Between Electoral Interest and Newspapers in Brazil (2004-2014). Revista Cesumar–Ciências Humanas e Sociais Aplicadas, v. 21, n. 1, p. 45-59, 2016. Disponível em: <http://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revcesumar/article/viewFile/3988/2789> Acesso em 18 Out. 2016.

MORAES, T. P. B.; SANTOS, R. M. Caça ao terrorismo e corrida eleitoral. Um estudo sobre o impacto do interesse regional pela morte de Osama bin Laden e a relação com os votos nas eleições presidenciais de 2012 nos Estados Unidos. Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences, v. 37, n. 1, p. 13, 2015. Disponível em: < http://eduem.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/viewFile/24281/pdf_39> Acesso em 22 Dez. 2016.

MORAES, T. P. B.; SANTOS, R. M. Do# ForaDilma ao# ForaTemer–as duas faces antagônicas de Jano. Pauta Geral-Estudos em Jornalismo, v. 3, n. 2, p. 66-82, 2016a. Disponível em: <http://177.101.17.124/index.php/pauta/article/viewFile/9296/5387> Acesso em 19 Dez. 2016.

MORAES, T. P. B.; SANTOS, R. M. Charlie Hebdo: Polémica, religião e o interesse dos usuários de Internet franceses. Comunicação Pública, v. 11, n. 20, 2016b. Disponível em: <http://cp.revues.org/1193> Acesso em 17 Dez. 2016.

MORAES, T. P. B.; SANTOS, R. M. Os protestos no Brasil: Um estudo sobre as pesquisas na web, e o caso da Primavera Brasileira. Revista internacional de investigación en ciencias sociales, v. 9, n. 2, p. 193-206, 2013. Disponível em: < https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/4713950.pdf > Acesso em 12 Dez. 2016.

MORAES, T. P. B.; QUADROS, D. G. de. Dos holofotes para o Youtube: debates e eleição presidencial de 2014. In: Congresso Internacional de Comunicação Política e Estratégias de Campanha, 5., 2016, Buenos Aires. Ponências. Buenos Aires: Asociación Lationoamericana de Investigadores En Campañas Electorales, 2016. p. 1 - 13. Disponível em: <http://www.alice-comunicacionpolitica.com/abrir-ponencia.php?f=7175cf3992b956c39fe2705c1d41d811.pdf>. Acesso em: 13 ago. 2016.

PARIGI, P.; SANTANA, J. J.; COOK, K. S. Online Field Experiments: Studying Social Interactions in Context. Social Psychology Quarterly, v. 80, n. 1, p. 1-19, 2017. Disponível em: < http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0190272516680842 >Acesso em 13 Jan. 2017.

PREIS, T.; MOAT, H. S.; STANLEY, H. E. Quantifying Trading Behavior in Financial Markets Using Google Trends. Scientific Reports, v. 3, p. 1684, 2013. Disponível em: < http://www.uvm.edu/~pdodds/research/papers/files/2013/preis2013a.pdf > Acesso em 14 Dez. 2016.

REUNING, K.; DIETRICH, N. Donald Trump has nothing left to gain from media coverage. Washington Post, v. 15, 2016. Disponível em: <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/01/15/donald-trump-has-nothing-left-to-gain-from-media-coverage/?utm_term=.a7b79ca3e7a3> Acesso em 11 Dez. 2016.

SONG, T. M. et al. Psychological and social factors affecting Internet searches on suicide in Korea: a big data analysis of Google search trends. Yonsei medical journal, v. 55, n. 1, p. 254-263, 2014. Disponível em: < https://synapse.koreamed.org/DOIx.php?id=10.3349/ymj.2014.55.1.254> Acesso em 12 Dez. 2016.

TORRES, E. C. Debates presidenciais na televisão: à procura de interesse, avaliação e efeitos. in Lobo, MC, Magalhães, P. orgs. As Eleições Legislativas e Presidenciais, v. 2006, p. 75-103, 2005. Disponível em: <http://www.academia.edu/15585469/Debates_Presidenciais_na_Televis%C3%A3o_%C3%80_Procura_de_Interesse_Avalia%C3%A7%C3%A3o_e_Efeitos_Presidencial_Debates_in_Television_Looking_for_Interest_Evaluation_and_Effects > Acesso em 18 Out. 2016.

TORRES, E. C. A televisão e o serviço público. Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos, 2016.

WANG, Y.; LI, Y.; LUO, J. Deciphering the 2016 US Presidential Campaign in the Twitter Sphere: A Comparison of the Trumpists and Clintonists. In: Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. 2016. Disponível em: < https://arxiv.org/pdf/1603.03097> Acesso em 12 nov. 2016.

WINNEG, K.; JAMIESON, K. H. Learning From the 2016 US General Election Presidential Debates. American Behavioral Scientist, p. 276-270, 2017. Disponível em: < http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0002764217702770 > Acesso em 12 Jan. 2016.

Published
2017-06-29
Section
Artigos Originais