Green areas in an urban area and provision of ecosystem services: a bibliometric and integrative review
Resumo
O processo de urbanização é realizado pela mudança no uso da terra, ou seja, pela interação do homem com a natureza, de forma que é comum que haja a perda do verde nas cidades. Contudo, tem-se percebido a necessidade e a importância do verde nas áreas urbanas para que se tenha qualidade na oferta de serviços ecossistêmicos. Estes serviços favorecem a qualidade de vida e o bem-estar humano das pessoas que residem no espaço urbano. De forma que estão sendo incentivadas as práticas de soluções baseadas na natureza, como forma de inovação para o planejamento urbano e para que os problemas nas cidades sejam superados. Foi proposto a realização de revisão integrativa e bibliométrica sobre as áreas verdes urbanas e a prestação de serviços ecossistêmicos, no período de 2009 a 2019. Dentre os resultados observa-se que há um crescente interesse pelo tema de pesquisa. Há reconhecimento da importância das áreas verdes para as necessidades populacionais, no que se remete à saúde humana física e mental E ainda, a necessidade de ações públicas em prol ao planejamento urbano envolvendo a questão, de forma a proporcionar acesso igualitário nas áreas existentes e ou naquelas que serão criadas.Referências
ALMEIDA, C.M.V.B; MARIANO, M.V.; AGOSTINHO, F.; LIU, G.Y.; GIANNETTI, B.F. Exploring the potential of urban park size for the provision of ecosystem services to urban centres: A case study in São Paulo, Brazil. Building and Environment, 144, 450-458, 2018a.
ALMEIDA, C.M.V.B; MARIANO, M.V.; AGOSTINHO, F.; LIU, G.Y.; YANG, Z.F.; COSCIEME, L.; GIANNETTI, B.F. Ecosystem Services, 30, 236-247, 2018b.
ALVES, L.E.R; CORREIA FILHO, W.L.F; GOMES, H.B.; OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, J.F.; SANCHES, F.O. Space-temporal evaluation of changes in soil use and soil cover and temperature in the metropolitan region of Baixada Santista. Bioscience Journal. 2019.
ANDERSSON-SKÖLD, A.; KLINGBERG, J.; GUNNARSSON, B.; CULLINANE, K.; GUSTAFSSON, I.; HEDBLOM, M.; KNEZ, I.; LINDBERG, F.; SANG, A.O.; PLEIJEL, H.; THORSSON, P.; THORSSON, S. A framework for assessing urban greenery's effects and valuing its ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Management, 205, 274-285, 2018.
AZEÑAS, V.; JANNER, I.; MEDRANO, H.; GULÍAS, J. Performance evaluation of five Mediterranean species to optimize ecosystem services of green roofs under water-limited conditions. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012, 236-247, 2018.
BARÓ, F.; PALOMO, I.; ZULIAN, G.; VIZCAINO, P.; HAASE, D.; GÓMEZ-BAGGETHUN, E. Mapping ecosystem service capacity, flow and demand for landscape and urban planning: A case study in the Barcelona metropolitan region. Land Use Policy, 57, 405-417, 2016.
BARTHEL, S.; FOLKE, C.; COLDING, J. Social–ecological memory in urban gardens - Retaining the capacity for management of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 20, 255-265, 2010.
BATTISTI, L.; PILLE, L.; WACHTEL, T.; LARCHER, F.; SÄUMEL, I. Residential Greenery: State of the Art and Health-Related Ecosystem Services and Disservices in the City of Berlin. Sustainability, 11, 1-20, 2019.
BELMEZITI, A.; CHERQUI, F.; KAUFMANN, B. Improving the multi-functionality of urban green spaces: relations between components of green spaces and urban services. Sustainable Cities and Society, 43, 1-10, 2018.
BORGSTRÖM, S.T. Patterns and challenges of urban nature conservation - A study of southern Sweden. Environment and Planning A, 41, 2671-2685, 2009.
CARDINALE, B.J.; DUFFY, J.E.; GONZALEZ, A.; HOOPER, D.U.; PERRINGS, C.; VENAIL, P.; NARWANI, A.; MACE, G.M.; TILMAN, D.; WARDLE, D.A.; KINZIG, A.P.; DAILY, G.C.; LOREAU, M.; GRACE, J.B.; LARIGAUDERIE, A.; SRIVASTAVA, D.S.; NAEEM, S. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature, 486, 59-67, 2012.
CORD, A.F.; ROEßIGER, F.; SCHWARZ, N. Geocaching data as an indicator for recreational ecosystem services inurban areas: Exploring spatial gradients, preferences and motivations. Landscape and Urban Planning, 144, 151-162, 2015.
COSTANZA, R.; DALY, H.E. Natural capital and sustainable development. Conservation Biology, 6, 37-46, 1992.
COSTANZA, R.; GROOT, R.S.; BRAAT, L.; KUBISZEWSKI, I.; FIORAMONTI, L.; SUTTON, P.; FARBER, S.; GRASSO, M. Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go?. Ecosystem Services, 28, 1-16, 2017.
DAILY, G.C.; DASGUPTA, S. Ecosystem services, concept of. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, 2, 353-362, 2001.
DE CARVALHO, R.M.; SZLAFSZTEIN, C.F. Urban vegetation loss and ecosystem services: the influence on climate regulation and noise and air pollution. Environmental Pollution, 245, 844-852, 2019.
DEPIETRI, Y.; WELLE, T.; RENAUD, F.G. Social vulnerability assessment of the Cologne urban area (Germany) to heat waves: links to ecosystem services. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 6, 98-117, 2013.
DÍAZ, S.; DEMISSEW, S.; CARABIAS, J.; JOLY, C.; LONSDALE, M. et al. The IPBES conceptual framework: connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 1-16, 2015.
DUFFY, J.E.; GODWIN, C.M.; CARDINALE, B.J. Biodiversity effects in the wild are common and as strong as key drivers of productivity. Nature, 549 (7671), 261-264, 2017.
ELMQVIST, T.; FRAGKIAS, M.; GOODNESS, J.; GÜNERALP, B.; MARCOTULLIO, P.J.; MCDONALD, R.I; et al. Urbanization, biodiversity, and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities, a global assessment. 2013.
FEDELE, G.; LOCATELLI, B.; DJOUDI, H. Mechanisms mediating the contribution of ecosystem services to human well-being and resilience. Ecosystem Services, 28, 43-54, 2017.
FINK, A. Conducting Research Literature Reviews. Los Angeles: Sage. 2010.
GAVRILIDIS, A.A.; NITÃ, M.R.; ONOSE, D.A.; BADIU, D.L.; NÃSTASE, I.I. Methodological framework for urban sprawl control through sustainable planning of urban green infrastructure. Ecological Indicators, 96, 67-78, 2019.
GRAÇA, M.; QUEIRÓS, C.; FARINHA-MARQUES, P.; CUNHA, M. Street trees as cultural elements in the city: Understanding how perception affects ecosystem services management in Porto, Portugal. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 30, 194-205, 2018a.
GRAÇA, M.; ALVES, P.; GONÇALVES, J. NOWAK, D.J.; HOEHN, R.; FARINHA-MARQUES, P.; CUNHA, M. Assessing how green space types affect ecosystem services delivery in Porto, Portugal. Landscape and Urban Planning, 170, 195-208, 2018b.
GREN, A.; ANDERSSON, E. Being efficient and green by rethinking the urban-rural divide - Combining urban expansion and food production by integrating an ecosystem service perspective into urban planning. Sustainable Cities and Society, 40, 74-82, 2018.
HAINES-YOUNG, R.H.; POTSCHIN, M.B. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. RAFFAELLI, D.; FRID, C. (Eds.), Ecosystems Ecology: a new synthesis. BES Ecological Reviews Series, CUP, Cambridge, 1-31, 2010.
HALLEUX, J.M.; MARCINCZAK, S.; VAN DER KRABBEN, E. The adaptive efficiency of land use planning measured by the control of urban sprawl. The cases of the Netherlands, Belgium and Poland. Land Use Policy, 29(4), 887-898, 2012.
HEPCAN, C.C.; HEPCAN, S. Assessing regulating ecosystem services provided by the Ege University Rectorship Garden. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 34, 10-16, 2018.
KORPILO, S.; JALKANEN, J.; VIRTANEN, T.; LEHVAÈVIRTA, S. Where are the hotspots and coldspots of landscape values, visitor use and biodiversity in an urban forest?. Plos One, 13(9), 1-19, 2018.
KRZYZANIAK, M.; ŚWIERK, D.; SZCZEPAŃSKA, M.; URBAŃSKI, P. Changes in the area of urban green space in cities of western Poland. Bulletin of Geography, 3, 65-77, 2018.
LEHMANN, I.; MATHEY, J.; RÖßLER, S.; BRÄUER, A.; GOLDBERG, V. Urban vegetation structure types as a methodological approach for identifying ecosystem services – Application to the analysis of micro-climatic effects. Ecological Indicators, 42, 58-72, 2014.
LIU, S.; DU, W.; SU, H.; WANG, S.; GUAN, Q. Quantifying impacts of land-use/cover change on urban vegetation gross primary production: a case study of Wuhan, China. Sustainability, 10(3), 714, 2018.
MACE, G.M.; NORRIS, K.; FITTER, A.H. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27, 19-25, 2012.
MACE, G.M. Whose conservation?. Science, 345(6204), 1558-1560, 2014.
MAHENG, D.; DUCTON, I.; LAUWAET, D.; ZEVENBERGEN, C.; PATHIRANA, A. The Sensitivity of Urban Heat Island to Urban Green Space - A Model-Based Study of City of Colombo, Sri Lanka. Atmosphere, 10(151), 1-17, 2019.
MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT - MAE. Ecosystems and Human Well-being. Island Press, Washington, DC, 2005.
MOSER, A.; RÖTZER, T.; PAULEIT, S.; PRETZSCH, H. Structure and ecosystem services of small-leaved lime (Tilia cordata Mill.) and black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) in urban environments. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14, 1110-1121, 2015.
PEDERSEN, E.; WEISNER, S.E.B.; JOHANSSON, M. Wetland areas' direct contributions to residents' well-being entitle them to high cultural ecosystem values. Science of the Total Environment, 646, 1315 – 1326, 2019.
PINHO, P.; CORREIA, O.; LECOQ, M.; MUNZI, S.; VASCONCELOS, S.; GONÇALVES, P.; REBELO, R.; ANTUNES, C.; SILVA, P.; FREITAS, C.; LOPES, N.; SANTOS-REIS, M.; BRANQUINHO, C. Evaluating green infrastructure in urban environments using a multi-taxa and functional diversity approach. Environmental Research, 147, 601-610, 2016.
PIRNAT, J.; HLADNIK, D. A tale of two cities—From separation to common green connectivity for maintaining of biodiversity and well-being. Land Use Policy, 84, 252-259, 2019.
RIBEIRO, F.P.; RIBEIRO, K.T. Participative mapping of cultural ecosystem services in Pedra Branca State Park, Brazil. Natureza & Conservação - Brazilian Journal of Nature Conservation, 14, 120-127, 2016.
SALATA. S.; RONCHI, S.; ARCIDIACONO, A. Mapping air filtering in urban areas. A Land Use Regression model for Ecosystem Services assessment in planning. Ecosystem Services, 28, 341-350, 2017.
SETO, K.C.; GÜNERALP, B.; HUTYRA, L.R. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(40), 16083-16088, 2012.
SZUMACHER, I.; PABJANEK, P. Temporal Changes in Ecosystem Services in European Cities in the Continental Biogeographical Region in the Period from 1990–2012. Sustainability, 9 (665), 2-14, 2017.
WRI. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington. 2005.
ZHOU, T.; KOOMENA, E.; VAN LEEUWENB, E.S. Residents’ preferences for cultural services of the landscape along the urban–rural gradiente. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 29, 131-141, 2018.
Os direitos autorais pertencem exclusivamente aos autores. Os direitos de licenciamento utilizado pelo periódico é a licença Creative Commons Attribution
Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional. São permitidos o compartilhamento (cópia e distribuição do material em qualquer meio ou formato) e adaptação (remixar, transformar, e criar a partir do trabalho, mesmo para fins comerciais), desde que lhe atribuam o devido crédito pela criação original.