Áreas verdes no espaço urbano e a prestação de serviços ecossistêmicos: uma revisão bibliométrica e integrativa

Abstract

The process of urbanization is accomplished by changes in land use, that is, by the interaction between man and nature, so that there is a common loss of green areas in cities. However, the need and importance of green areas inside urban areas has been emphasized in order to provide quality to the provision of ecosystem services. Such services favor the quality of life and human well-being of people living in urban areas. Thus, nature-based solution practices have been encouraged as a form of innovation for urban planning and to overcome problems in cities. An integrative and bibliometric review on urban green areas and ecosystem service provision was proposed from 2009 to 2019. Among the results, there is a growing interest in the topic. There is recognition of the importance of green areas for population needs regarding human physical and mental health. In addition, the need for public actions in favor of urban planning involving the issue is recognized in order to provide equal access to existing areas and/or in areas that will be created.

Author Biographies

Maycon Jorge Ulisses Saraiva Farinha, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados - UFGD
Mestre em Agronegócios pela Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados (UFGD). Doutorando em Geografia pela Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados (UFGD), Dourados (MS), Brasil.
André Geraldo Berezuk, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados - UFGD
Doutor em Geografia pela Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Campus de Presidente Prudente. Professor no Departamento de Geografia da Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados (UFGD), Dourados (MS), Brasil
Luciana Virginia Mario Bernardo, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados - UFGD
Doutora em Desenvolvimento Regional e Agronegócios, pela Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE). Professora no curso de Ciências Contábeis na Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados (UFGD), Dourados (MS), Brasil.

References

ALMEIDA, C.M.V.B; MARIANO, M.V.; AGOSTINHO, F.; LIU, G.Y.; GIANNETTI, B.F. Exploring the potential of urban park size for the provision of ecosystem services to urban centres: A case study in São Paulo, Brazil. Building and Environment, 144, 450-458, 2018a.

ALMEIDA, C.M.V.B; MARIANO, M.V.; AGOSTINHO, F.; LIU, G.Y.; YANG, Z.F.; COSCIEME, L.; GIANNETTI, B.F. Ecosystem Services, 30, 236-247, 2018b.

ALVES, L.E.R; CORREIA FILHO, W.L.F; GOMES, H.B.; OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, J.F.; SANCHES, F.O. Space-temporal evaluation of changes in soil use and soil cover and temperature in the metropolitan region of Baixada Santista. Bioscience Journal. 2019.

ANDERSSON-SKÖLD, A.; KLINGBERG, J.; GUNNARSSON, B.; CULLINANE, K.; GUSTAFSSON, I.; HEDBLOM, M.; KNEZ, I.; LINDBERG, F.; SANG, A.O.; PLEIJEL, H.; THORSSON, P.; THORSSON, S. A framework for assessing urban greenery's effects and valuing its ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Management, 205, 274-285, 2018.

AZEÑAS, V.; JANNER, I.; MEDRANO, H.; GULÍAS, J. Performance evaluation of five Mediterranean species to optimize ecosystem services of green roofs under water-limited conditions. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012, 236-247, 2018.

BARÓ, F.; PALOMO, I.; ZULIAN, G.; VIZCAINO, P.; HAASE, D.; GÓMEZ-BAGGETHUN, E. Mapping ecosystem service capacity, flow and demand for landscape and urban planning: A case study in the Barcelona metropolitan region. Land Use Policy, 57, 405-417, 2016.

BARTHEL, S.; FOLKE, C.; COLDING, J. Social–ecological memory in urban gardens - Retaining the capacity for management of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 20, 255-265, 2010.

BATTISTI, L.; PILLE, L.; WACHTEL, T.; LARCHER, F.; SÄUMEL, I. Residential Greenery: State of the Art and Health-Related Ecosystem Services and Disservices in the City of Berlin. Sustainability, 11, 1-20, 2019.

BELMEZITI, A.; CHERQUI, F.; KAUFMANN, B. Improving the multi-functionality of urban green spaces: relations between components of green spaces and urban services. Sustainable Cities and Society, 43, 1-10, 2018.

BORGSTRÖM, S.T. Patterns and challenges of urban nature conservation - A study of southern Sweden. Environment and Planning A, 41, 2671-2685, 2009.

CARDINALE, B.J.; DUFFY, J.E.; GONZALEZ, A.; HOOPER, D.U.; PERRINGS, C.; VENAIL, P.; NARWANI, A.; MACE, G.M.; TILMAN, D.; WARDLE, D.A.; KINZIG, A.P.; DAILY, G.C.; LOREAU, M.; GRACE, J.B.; LARIGAUDERIE, A.; SRIVASTAVA, D.S.; NAEEM, S. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature, 486, 59-67, 2012.

CORD, A.F.; ROEßIGER, F.; SCHWARZ, N. Geocaching data as an indicator for recreational ecosystem services inurban areas: Exploring spatial gradients, preferences and motivations. Landscape and Urban Planning, 144, 151-162, 2015.

COSTANZA, R.; DALY, H.E. Natural capital and sustainable development. Conservation Biology, 6, 37-46, 1992.

COSTANZA, R.; GROOT, R.S.; BRAAT, L.; KUBISZEWSKI, I.; FIORAMONTI, L.; SUTTON, P.; FARBER, S.; GRASSO, M. Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go?. Ecosystem Services, 28, 1-16, 2017.

DAILY, G.C.; DASGUPTA, S. Ecosystem services, concept of. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, 2, 353-362, 2001.

DE CARVALHO, R.M.; SZLAFSZTEIN, C.F. Urban vegetation loss and ecosystem services: the influence on climate regulation and noise and air pollution. Environmental Pollution, 245, 844-852, 2019.

DEPIETRI, Y.; WELLE, T.; RENAUD, F.G. Social vulnerability assessment of the Cologne urban area (Germany) to heat waves: links to ecosystem services. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 6, 98-117, 2013.

DÍAZ, S.; DEMISSEW, S.; CARABIAS, J.; JOLY, C.; LONSDALE, M. et al. The IPBES conceptual framework: connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 1-16, 2015.

DUFFY, J.E.; GODWIN, C.M.; CARDINALE, B.J. Biodiversity effects in the wild are common and as strong as key drivers of productivity. Nature, 549 (7671), 261-264, 2017.

ELMQVIST, T.; FRAGKIAS, M.; GOODNESS, J.; GÜNERALP, B.; MARCOTULLIO, P.J.; MCDONALD, R.I; et al. Urbanization, biodiversity, and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities, a global assessment. 2013.

FEDELE, G.; LOCATELLI, B.; DJOUDI, H. Mechanisms mediating the contribution of ecosystem services to human well-being and resilience. Ecosystem Services, 28, 43-54, 2017.

FINK, A. Conducting Research Literature Reviews. Los Angeles: Sage. 2010.

GAVRILIDIS, A.A.; NITÃ, M.R.; ONOSE, D.A.; BADIU, D.L.; NÃSTASE, I.I. Methodological framework for urban sprawl control through sustainable planning of urban green infrastructure. Ecological Indicators, 96, 67-78, 2019.

GRAÇA, M.; QUEIRÓS, C.; FARINHA-MARQUES, P.; CUNHA, M. Street trees as cultural elements in the city: Understanding how perception affects ecosystem services management in Porto, Portugal. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 30, 194-205, 2018a.

GRAÇA, M.; ALVES, P.; GONÇALVES, J. NOWAK, D.J.; HOEHN, R.; FARINHA-MARQUES, P.; CUNHA, M. Assessing how green space types affect ecosystem services delivery in Porto, Portugal. Landscape and Urban Planning, 170, 195-208, 2018b.

GREN, A.; ANDERSSON, E. Being efficient and green by rethinking the urban-rural divide - Combining urban expansion and food production by integrating an ecosystem service perspective into urban planning. Sustainable Cities and Society, 40, 74-82, 2018.

HAINES-YOUNG, R.H.; POTSCHIN, M.B. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. RAFFAELLI, D.; FRID, C. (Eds.), Ecosystems Ecology: a new synthesis. BES Ecological Reviews Series, CUP, Cambridge, 1-31, 2010.

HALLEUX, J.M.; MARCINCZAK, S.; VAN DER KRABBEN, E. The adaptive efficiency of land use planning measured by the control of urban sprawl. The cases of the Netherlands, Belgium and Poland. Land Use Policy, 29(4), 887-898, 2012.

HEPCAN, C.C.; HEPCAN, S. Assessing regulating ecosystem services provided by the Ege University Rectorship Garden. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 34, 10-16, 2018.

KORPILO, S.; JALKANEN, J.; VIRTANEN, T.; LEHVAÈVIRTA, S. Where are the hotspots and coldspots of landscape values, visitor use and biodiversity in an urban forest?. Plos One, 13(9), 1-19, 2018.

KRZYZANIAK, M.; ŚWIERK, D.; SZCZEPAŃSKA, M.; URBAŃSKI, P. Changes in the area of urban green space in cities of western Poland. Bulletin of Geography, 3, 65-77, 2018.

LEHMANN, I.; MATHEY, J.; RÖßLER, S.; BRÄUER, A.; GOLDBERG, V. Urban vegetation structure types as a methodological approach for identifying ecosystem services – Application to the analysis of micro-climatic effects. Ecological Indicators, 42, 58-72, 2014.

LIU, S.; DU, W.; SU, H.; WANG, S.; GUAN, Q. Quantifying impacts of land-use/cover change on urban vegetation gross primary production: a case study of Wuhan, China. Sustainability, 10(3), 714, 2018.

MACE, G.M.; NORRIS, K.; FITTER, A.H. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27, 19-25, 2012.

MACE, G.M. Whose conservation?. Science, 345(6204), 1558-1560, 2014.

MAHENG, D.; DUCTON, I.; LAUWAET, D.; ZEVENBERGEN, C.; PATHIRANA, A. The Sensitivity of Urban Heat Island to Urban Green Space - A Model-Based Study of City of Colombo, Sri Lanka. Atmosphere, 10(151), 1-17, 2019.

MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT - MAE. Ecosystems and Human Well-being. Island Press, Washington, DC, 2005.

MOSER, A.; RÖTZER, T.; PAULEIT, S.; PRETZSCH, H. Structure and ecosystem services of small-leaved lime (Tilia cordata Mill.) and black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) in urban environments. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14, 1110-1121, 2015.

PEDERSEN, E.; WEISNER, S.E.B.; JOHANSSON, M. Wetland areas' direct contributions to residents' well-being entitle them to high cultural ecosystem values. Science of the Total Environment, 646, 1315 – 1326, 2019.

PINHO, P.; CORREIA, O.; LECOQ, M.; MUNZI, S.; VASCONCELOS, S.; GONÇALVES, P.; REBELO, R.; ANTUNES, C.; SILVA, P.; FREITAS, C.; LOPES, N.; SANTOS-REIS, M.; BRANQUINHO, C. Evaluating green infrastructure in urban environments using a multi-taxa and functional diversity approach. Environmental Research, 147, 601-610, 2016.

PIRNAT, J.; HLADNIK, D. A tale of two cities—From separation to common green connectivity for maintaining of biodiversity and well-being. Land Use Policy, 84, 252-259, 2019.

RIBEIRO, F.P.; RIBEIRO, K.T. Participative mapping of cultural ecosystem services in Pedra Branca State Park, Brazil. Natureza & Conservação - Brazilian Journal of Nature Conservation, 14, 120-127, 2016.

SALATA. S.; RONCHI, S.; ARCIDIACONO, A. Mapping air filtering in urban areas. A Land Use Regression model for Ecosystem Services assessment in planning. Ecosystem Services, 28, 341-350, 2017.

SETO, K.C.; GÜNERALP, B.; HUTYRA, L.R. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(40), 16083-16088, 2012.

SZUMACHER, I.; PABJANEK, P. Temporal Changes in Ecosystem Services in European Cities in the Continental Biogeographical Region in the Period from 1990–2012. Sustainability, 9 (665), 2-14, 2017.

WRI. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington. 2005.

ZHOU, T.; KOOMENA, E.; VAN LEEUWENB, E.S. Residents’ preferences for cultural services of the landscape along the urban–rural gradiente. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 29, 131-141, 2018.

Published
2021-12-01