Assessment of healthcare professionals' satisfaction with electronic prescription in a university hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17765/2176-9206.2026v19e13486Keywords:
Prescrição eletrônica, Satisfação do Usuário, Avaliação de Tecnologias de SaúdeAbstract
The objective was to evaluate the level of user satisfaction with electronic prescribing in a university hospital. This was a descriptive-analytical study whose target population consisted of users of the electronic prescribing system. A standardized questionnaire with closed-ended questions was used for data collection, and the Likert scale was employed as the assessment instrument. In total, 104 participants were included. Overall satisfaction with computerization was considered good. The lowest score was attributed to the training provided, while the highest score was assigned to the perceived quality of the system. There was no statistically significant difference in overall satisfaction among professional categories. It is recommended that the training program be reviewed to identify aspects that need improvement, thereby enhancing user adherence to the platform.
Downloads
References
1. Gates PJ, Hardie RA, Raban MZ, Li L, Westbrook JI. How effective are electronic medication systems in reducing medication error rates and associated harm among hospital inpatients? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Inf Ass. 2021:28(1):167-77. Available from: https:// 10.1093/jamia/ocaa230.
2. Fumis RRL, Costa ELV, Martins PS, Pizzo V, Souza IA, Schettino GPP. A equipe da UTI está satisfeita com o prontuário eletrônico do paciente? Um estudo transversal. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2014:26(1):1-6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20140001.
3. Colleti-Junior J, Andrade AB, Carvalho WB. Avaliação do uso de sistemas de prontuário eletrônico nas unidades de terapia intensiva brasileiras. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2018:3(3):338-46. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20180057.
4. Rouayroux N, Calmels V, Bachelet B, Sallerin B, Divol E. Medication prescribing errors: a pre- and post-computerized physician order entry retrospective study. Int J Clin Pharm. 2019:41:228-36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0747-0.
5. Vélez-Díaz-Pallarés M, Pérez-Menéndez-Conde C, Bermejo-Vicedo T. Systematic review of computerized prescriber order entry and clinical decision support. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2018:75(23):1909-21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp170870.
6. Gohari SH, Bahaadinbeigy K, Tajoddini S, Kalhori SRN. Effect of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support system on adverse drug events prevention in the emergency department: a systematic review. J. Pharm Technol. 2021:37(1): 53-61. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/8755122520958160.
7. Kinlay M, Zheng WY, Burke R, Juraskova I, Moles R, Baysari M. Medication errors related to computerized provider order entry systems in hospitals and how they change over time: A narrative review. Res. Soc. Admin. Pharm. 2021:17: 1546-52. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.12.004.
8. Raeesi A, Abbasi R, Khajouei R. Evaluating physicians’ perspectives on the efficiency and effectiveness of the electronic prescribing system. Int J Technol Asses Health Care 2021:37(1):e42. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646232100005.
9. Alsahali S et al. Perceptions of community pharmacists toward the national e-prescribing service (Wasfaty) and exploring the benefits and challenges of the service: a descriptive study from Qassim region, Saudi Arabia. Pharmacy 2023:11(152). Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/ pharmacy11050152.
10. Majewski CC. Pesquisa de satisfação de usuários do sistema de prontuário eletrônico do Complexo Hospitalar Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre. 2003. 88f. Dissertação (Mestrado Profissional em Engenharia de Produção), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2003.
11. Longhurst CA, Davis T, Maneker A, Eschenroeder Jr HC, Dunscombe R, Reynolds G, et al. Local investment in training drives electronic health record user satisfaction. App Clin Inf. 2019:10(2):331-5. 10.1055/s-0039-1688753. Available from: https://doi.org/ 10.1055/s-0039-1688753.
12. Hareem A, Lee J, Stupans I, Park JS, Wang K. Benefits and barriers associated with e-prescribing in community pharmacy – a systematic review. Exp Res Clin Soc Pharm 2023:12:100375. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100375
13. Alshahrani F, Marriott JF, Cox AR. A qualitative study of prescribing errors among multi?professional prescribers within an e?prescribing system. Int J Clin Pharm 2021:43:884-92. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-020-01192-0.
14. Carrera-Hueso FJ, Merino-Plaza MJ, Ramón-Barrios MA, Lopez-Merino EI, Vazquez-Ferreiro P, Poquet-Jornet J. Proposed model to determine satisfaction with computerised provider order entry systems in a long-stay hospital. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2019:26(2):73-8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-001345.
15. Teferi GH et al. Perception of physicians towards electronic prescription system and associated factors at resource limited setting 2021: Cross sectional study. Plos One 2022:17(3). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262759.
16. Amiri P, Rahimi B, Khalkhali HR. Nurses attitudes toward computerized provider order entry (CPOE) system: a feasibility study prior to implementation. J Clin Res Paramed Sci. 2020: 9(2): e101420. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5812/jcrps.101420.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Saúde e Pesquisa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
A submissão de originais para a revista Saúde e Pesquisa implica na transferência da Carta Concessão de Direitos Autorais, pelos autores, dos direitos de publicação digital para a revista após serem informados do aceite de publicação.A Secretaria Editorial irá fornecer da um modelo de Carta de Concessão de Direitos Autorais, indicando o cumprimento integral de princípios éticos e legislação específica. Os direitos autorais dos artigos publicados nesta revista são de direito do autor, com direitos da revista sobre a primeira publicação. Os autores somente poderão utilizar os mesmos resultados em outras publicações, indicando claramente a revista Saúde e Pesquisa como o meio da publicação original. Em virtude de tratar-se de um periódico de acesso aberto, é permitido o uso gratuito dos artigos, principalmente em aplicações educacionais e científicas, desde que citada a fonte. A Saúde e Pesquisa adota a licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
A revista se reserva o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua e a credibilidade do veículo. Respeitará, no entanto, o estilo de escrever dos autores. Alterações, correções ou sugestões de ordem conceitual serão encaminhadas aos autores, quando necessário. Nesses casos, os artigos, depois de adequados, deverão ser submetidos a nova apreciação. As opiniões emitidas pelos autores dos artigos são de sua exclusiva responsabilidade.








