Causal role of gender in hip arthroplasty: affected hip, previous diagnosis and hospitalization duration

Keywords: Causality, Hip arthroplasty, Gender duration, Propensity score

Abstract

Causal relationship between the gender of patients who underwent hip arthroplasty with regard to affected hip, previous diagnosis, type of arthroplasty and hospitalization duration is analyzed by a retrospective and cross-sectional study with 100 patients from an orthopedic clinic, who underwent total (THA) and partial (PHA) hip arthroplasty. The sample was collected between March 2018 and January 2019. The analysis consisted of a comparative causal model between males and females through propensity score. The covariates were illustrated by the Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG). The patient’s gender was causally associated with the affected hip (p = 0.038), previous diagnosis - osteoarthritis or femoral neck fracture (p = 0.004) and duration of hospitalization (p < 0.001), but failed to explain the hip arthroplasty type (p = 0.385). The left hip was more affected in males (71%), whilst females had a prevalent diagnosis of femur fracture (69.3%) and osteoarthritis in males (65.7%). Further, 71% of males underwent THA, similar to females. Males were hospitalized for -2.12 days less than females. Gender had a causal relationship with affected hip, previous diagnosis, and length of stay in THA, but it was not associated with type of arthroplasty.

Author Biographies

Danilo Lustosa Nogueira, Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Maranhão
MD, resident in Orthopedics and Traumatology at the University Hospital of the Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís (MA), Brazil.
João Ferreira Silva Junior, Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Maranhão
Physiotherapists, multiprofessional resident in Attention in Medical and Surgical Clinic at the University Hospital of the Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís (MA), Brazil.
Ana Letícia Santos do Nascimento, Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Maranhão
Physiotherapists, multiprofessional resident in Attention in Medical and Surgical Clinic at the University Hospital of the Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís (MA), Brazil.
Ana Carolina Sá Mendonça, Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Maranhão
Physiotherapists, multiprofessional resident in Attention in Medical and Surgical Clinic at the University Hospital of the Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís (MA), Brazil.
Tamires Barradas Cavalcante, Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Maranhão
PhD Student in Coletive Health, Nurse in the Orthopedics and Traumatology sector at the University Hospital of the Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís (MA), Brazil.
Raul Frankllim de Carvalho Almeida, Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Maranhão
MD, PhD in Medical Sciences, Sector of Orthopedics and Traumatology at the University Hospital of the Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís (MA), Brazil.

References

1. Lenza M, Ferraz SDB, Viola DCM, Garcia Filho RJ, Cendoroglo Neto M, Ferretti M. Epidemiologia da artroplastia total de quadril e de joelho: estudo transversal. Einstein (São Paulo) [Internet]. 2013; 11 (2): 197-202. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082013000200011&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en

2. Silva JCA, Cavalcante TB, Santos NMC dos, Nascimento RKG, Costa ACLF da, Miranda JS. Análise comparativa do nível de dependência funcional de idosos submetidos a artroplastia de quadril: estudo transversal. Rev Pesqui em Fisioter. 2018; 8 (4): 463.

3. Berg U, BüLow E, Sundberg M, Rolfson O. No increase in readmissions or adverse events after implementation of fast-track program in total hip and knee replacement at 8 Swedish hospitals: An observational before-and-after study of 14,148 total joint replacements 2011-2015. Acta Orthop. 2018; 89 (5): 522-7.

4. Pamilo KJ, Peltola M, Mäkelä K, Häkkinen U, Paloneva J, Remes V. Is hospital volume associated with length of stay, re-admissions and reoperations for total hip replacement? A population-based register analysis of 78 hospitals and 54,505 replacements. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013; 133 (12): 1747-55.

5. Colombari F. Impacto de medidas perioperatórias no tempo de permanência e nos desfechos de artroplastia de joelho e de quadril em um hospital privado de São Paulo. Fundação Getúlio Vargas; 2019.

6. Singh JA. Epidemiology of Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. Open Orthop J. 2011; 5 (1): 80-5.

7. Ferreira M de C, Oliveira JCP, Zidan FF, Franciozi CE da S, Luzo MVM, Abdalla RJ. Total knee and hip arthroplasty: the reality of assistance in Brazilian public health care. Rev Bras Ortop [Internet]. 2018; 53 (4): 432-40. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbo.2016.11.002

8. Vincent HK, Alfano AP, Lee L, Vincent KR. Sex and age effects on outcomes of total hip arthroplasty after inpatient rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87 (4): 461-7.

9. Sachetti A, Vidmar MF, Venâncio G, Tombini DK, Sordi S, Pilla S, et al. Perfil epidemiológico de idosos com osteoartrose. Rev Ciências Médicas e Biológicas [Internet]. 2010; 9 (3): 212-5. Available from: https://rigs.ufba.br/index.php/cmbio/article/view/4510/3721

10. Pancotte J, Bortoluzzi EC, Graeff DB, Luísa A, Anna S, Wibelinger M, et al. Osteoartrite: prevalência e presença de fatores associados em idosos ativos Osteoarthritis: prevalence and presence of risk factors in elderly active. Rev Ciênc Méd Biol. 2017; 16 (1): 40-4.

11. Rezende MU de, Campos GC de, Pailo AF. Conceitos atuais em osteoartrite. Acta Ortopédica Bras. 2013; 21 (2): 120-2.

12. Kokubo Y, Oki H, Sugita D, Negoro K, Takeno K, Miyazaki T, et al. Long-term clinical outcome of acetabular cup revision surgery: comparison of cemented cups, cementless cups, and cemented cups with reinforcement devices. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016 May; 26 (4): 407-13.

13. Lopez-de-Andres A, Jimenez-Garcia R, Jimenez-Trujillo I, Hernandez-Barrera V, de Miguel-Yanes JM, Mendez-Bailon M, et al. Incidence, surgical procedures, and outcomes of hip fracture among elderly type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients in Spain (2004-2013). Osteoporos Int. 2016 Feb; 27 (2): 605-16.

14. Molloy IB, Martin BI, Moschetti WE, Jevsevar DS. Effects of the length of stay on the cost of total knee and total hip arthroplasty from 2002 to 2013. J Bone Jt Surg - Am Vol. 2017; 99 (5): 402-7.

15. Silva ERR, Marinho DF. Perfil epidemiológico de idosos com fratura proximal de fêmur atendidos no Hospital Regional do Baixo Amazonas, Santarém, PA, Brasil. Rev Kairós Gerontol. 2018; 21 (3): 217-36.

16. Pereira L, Piano A De, Golmia RP, Scheinberg M. Artroplastia total de quadril e joelho: aspectos clínicos na fase perioperatória. Einstein. 2010; 8 (11): 350-3.

17. Gholson JJ, Noiseux NO, Otero JE, Gao Y, Shah AS. Patient Factors Systematically Influence Hospital Length of Stay in Common Orthopaedic Procedures. Iowa Orthop J [Internet]. 2017; 37: 233-7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28852363

18. Ackerman IN, Bohensky MA, de Steiger R, Brand CA, Eskelinen A, Fenstad AM, et al. Lifetime Risk of Primary Total Hip Replacement Surgery for Osteoarthritis From 2003 to 2013: A Multinational Analysis Using National Registry Data. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Nov; 69 (11): 1659-67.

19. Schairer WW, Sing DC, Vail TP, Bozic KJ. Causes and frequency of unplanned hospital readmission after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472 (2): 464-70.

20. Ju DG, Rajaee SS, Mirocha J, Lin CA, Moon CN. Nationwide analysis of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients a receding tide. J Bone Jt Surg - Am Vol. 2017; 99 (22): 1932-40.

21. Panteli M, Habeeb S, McRoberts J, Porteous MJ. Enhanced care for primary hip arthroplasty: Factors affecting length of hospital stay. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014; 24 (3): 353-8.

22. Dale H, Børsheim S, Kristensen TB, Fenstad AM, Gjertsen JE, Hallan G, et al. Fixation, sex, and age: highest risk of revision for uncemented stems in elderly women - data from 66,995 primary total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2020; 91 (1): 33-41.

23. Cawley DT, Guerin SJ, Walsh J, Simpkin A, Masterson EL. The significance of hand dominance in hip osteoarthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015 Apr; 44 (5): 527-30.

24. Abreu EL De, Oliveira MHA De. Avaliação da qualidade de vida dos pacientes submetidos à hemiartroplastia do quadril. Rev Bras Ortop [Internet]. 2015; 50 (5): 530-6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbo.2014.09.008

25. Dobson M, Waldron T. SCJ osteoarthritis: The significance of joint surface location for diagnosis. Int J Paleopathol. 2019; 24 (August 2018): 48-51.

26. Galia CR, Diesel CV, Guimarães MR, Ribeiro TA. Atualização em artroplastia total de quadril: uma técnica ainda em desenvolvimento. Rev Bras Ortop [Internet]. 2017; 52 (5): 521-7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbo.2016.09.013

27. Lieverse AR, Mack B, Bazaliiskii VI, Weber AW. Revisiting osteoarthritis in the Cis-Baikal: Understanding behavioral variability and adaptation among middle Holocene foragers. Quat Int [Internet]. 2016; 405: 160-71. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.03.019

28. Towle KM, Monnot AD. An Assessment of Gender-Specific Risk of Implant Revision After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Dec; 31 (12): 2941-8.

29. Borrero S, Kwoh CK, Sartorius J, Ibrahim SA. Brief report: Gender and total knee/hip arthroplasty utilization rate in the VA system. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Mar; 21 Suppl 3: S54-7.

30. Pulikottil-Jacob R, Connock M, Kandala N-B, Mistry H, Grove A, Freeman K, et al. Cost effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty in osteoarthritis: comparison of devices with differing bearing surfaces and modes of fixation. Bone Joint J. 2015 Apr; 97-B (4): 449-57.

31. Rhee C, Lethbridge L, Richardson G, Dunbar M. Risk factors for infection, revision, death, blood transfusion and longer hospital stay 3 months and 1 year after primary total hip or knee arthroplasty. Can J Surg. 2018; 61 (3): 165-76.

32. Lyman S, Fields KG, Nocon AA, Ricciardi BF, Boettner F. Prolonged Length of Stay Is Not an Acceptable Alternative to Coded Complications in Assessing Hospital Quality in Elective Joint Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2015; 30 (11): 1863-7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.019

33. Inneh IA, Iorio R, Slover JD, Bosco JA. Role of Sociodemographic, Co-morbid and Intraoperative Factors in Length of Stay Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015; 30 (12): 2092-7.

34. Otero JE, Gholson JJ, Pugely AJ, Gao Y, Bedard NA, Callaghan JJ. Length of Hospitalization After Joint Arthroplasty: Does Early Discharge Affect Complications and Readmission Rates? J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2016; 31 (12): 2714-25. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.07.026

35. Shah A, Memon M, Kay J, Wood TJ, Tushinski DM, Khanna V. Preoperative Patient Factors Affecting Length of Stay following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2019; 34 (9): 2124-2165.e1. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.048

Published
2021-04-30
Section
Artigos Originais