Working process of nurses of the Family Health Strategy

Keywords: Unified Health System, Primary Health Care, Family Health Strategy, Nursing

Abstract

The work process of nurses in Family Health Strategy teams is analyzed. Current case study, foregrounded on qualitative approach and based on Symbolic Interactionism, was conducted with nine nurses. Data were collected between March and June 2016 by a semi-structured interview. Thematic content analysis was employed. Work object is identified by spontaneous demand, several activities have a scheduled agenda, besides management issues. Relational and hard technologies were acknowledged as working tools. The developed activities are still focused on the cure model, but an approach to health promotion and disease prevention is acknowledged. Facilitating factors comprised teamwork and Nursing Residence, whereas incomplete staffs made up the difficulties. Care reproduces the biomedical model and professionals acknowledge the need for change.

Author Biographies

Gabriela dos Santos, Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei - UFSJ
Nurse at the Municipal Health Department of Carmo do Cajuru (MG). Scientific Initiation Scholarship PIBIC 2017/2018, Federal University of São João del-Rei, Divinópolis (MG), Brazil.
Fernanda Moura Lanza, Universidade Federal São João Del-Rei - UFSJ
Adjunct Professor IV. Federal University of São João del-Rei, Divinópolis (MG), Brazil.
Maria Helena Trindade Engela, Secretaria Municipal da Saúde de Onça de Pitangui (MG)
Nurse at the Municipal Health Department of Onça de Pitangui (MG), Brazil.
Juliana Ferreira da Silva, Centro Universitário Newton Paiva
Professor at Newton Paiva University Center, Belo Horizonte (MG), Brazil.
Vanessa Aparecida Júlio
Nurse, Brazil.
Ronimara Gonçalves de Souza, Unidade de Pronto Atendimento, Divinópolis (MG)
Nurse at the Emergency Care Unit, Divinópolis (MG), Brazil.
Lucas Alves Gontijo, Secretaria Municipal de Saúde, Nova Serrana (MG)
Nurse at the Municipal Health Department, Nova Serrana (MG), Brazil.

References

1. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Portaria 2436, de 21 de setembro de 2017. Aprova a Política Nacional de atenção Básica. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 21 set. 2017. Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2017/prt2436_22_09_2017.html

2. Braghetto GT, Sousa LA, Beretta D, Vendramini SHF. Dificuldades e facilidades do enfermeiro da Saúde da Família no processo de trabalho. Cad. saúde colet. [Internet]. 2019 Dec [cited 2020 Nov 24]; 27(4): 420-426. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-462X2019000400420&lng=en. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1414-462x201900040100.

3. Seixas CT, Merhy EE, Baduy RS, Slomp Junior H. Integrality in the health care perspective: an experience of the Unified Health System in Brazil. Saúde Coletiva [Internet]. 2016 ago [cited 2019 July 2]; 12(1):113-123. Available from: http://revistas.unla.edu.ar/saludcolectiva/article/view/874/pdf http://dx.doi.org/10.18294/sc.2016.874

4. Mendes-Gonçalves RBM. Tecnologia e organização social das práticas de saúde: características tecnológicas do processo de trabalho na rede estadual de centros de saúde de São Paulo. São Paulo (SP): HUCITEC; 1994.

5. Ferreira SRS, Périco LAD, Dias VRGF. A complexidade do trabalho do enfermeiro na Atenção Primária à Saúde. Rev Bras Enferm. [Internet]. 2018 Nov [cited 2020 Nov 20]; 71 (supl1):784-9. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/pdf/reben/v71s1/0034-7167-reben-71-s1-0704.pdf doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0471

6. Fertonani HP, Pires DEP, Biff D, Scherer MDA. The health care model: concepts and challenges for primary health care in Brazil. Ciênc. saúde coletiva [Internet]. 2015 Jun [cited 2020 Sep 21]; 20(6):1869-78. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1413-81232015000601869&lng=en&nrm=iso doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232015206.13272014.

7. Arantes LJ, Shimizu HE, Merchán-Hamann E. The benefits and challenges of the Family Health Strategy in Brazilian Primary Health care: a literature review Ciênc. saúde coletiva [Internet]. 2016 May [cited 2019 Ago 06]; 21(5): 1499-1510. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S1413-81232016000501499&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232015215.19602015.

8. Garbois JA, Sodré F, Dalbello-Araujo M. Da noção de determinação social à de determinantes sociais da saúde. Saúde debate [Internet]. 2017 Mar [cited 2019 Sep 01]; 41(112):63-76. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0103-11042017000100063&script=sci_abstract&tlng=pt doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-1104201711206.

9. Nascimento LC, Viegas SMF, Menezes C, Roquini GR, Santos TR. O SUS na vida dos brasileiros: assistência, acessibilidade e equidade no cotidiano de usuários da Atenção Primária à Saúde. Physis [Internet]. 2020 [citado 2020 Nov 24]; 30(3): e300330. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-73312020000300612&lng=pt. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-73312020300330.

10. Yin RK. Estudo de Caso Planejamento e Métodos. 5 ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2014.

11. Minayo MCS. O desafio do conhecimento: pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. 14 ed. São Paulo: Hucitec, 2012, 408p.

12. Blumer H. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969.

13. Brasil, Ministério da Saúde. E-Gestor atenção básica. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2020 [citado 2020 Nov 24]. Disponível em: https://egestorab.saude.gov.br/paginas/acessoPublico/relatorios/relHistoricoCoberturaAB.xhtml

14. Merhy EE. Em busca do tempo perdido: a micropolítica do trabalho vivo em saúde. In: Onoko R, Merhy EE, organizadores. Agir em saúde: um desafio para o público. 3 ed. São Paulo: Hucitec; 2007. p. 71-112.

15. Menezes ELC, Scherer MDA, Verdi MI, Pires DEP. Manners of producing care and universality of access in primary health care. Saúde soc. [Internet]. 2017 Dez [cited 2019 Aug 06] ;26(4):888-903. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0104-12902017000400888&script=sci_abstract doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0104-12902017170497.

16. Camelo MS, Lima LR, Volpe CRG, Santos WS, Rehem TCMSB. Welcoming in primary health care from the viewpoint of nurses. Acta paul. enferm. [Internet]. 2016 Aug [cited 2019 Jun 26]; 29(4):463-468. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0103-21002016000400463&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-0194201600063.

17. Utzumi FC, Lacerda MR, Bernardino E, Gomes IM, Aued GK, Sousa SM. Continuity of care and the symbolic interactionism: a possible understanding. Texto contexto - enferm. [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Feb 16] ; 27( 2 ): e4250016. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0104-07072018000200308&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-070720180004250016.

18. Mattig T, Cantoreggi N, Simos J, Kruit CF, Christie DPTH. HIA in Switzerland: strategies for achieving Health in All Policies. Health Promotion International [Internet] 2017 Nov [cited 2020 nov 21]; 32 (1), 149-56. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/heapro/article/32/1/149/2950937 doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dav087

19. Regis CG, Batista NA. The nurse in the area of collective health: conceptions and competencies. Rev. Bras. Enferm. [Internet]. 2015 Oct [cited 2019 May 27]; 68(5): 830-836.Available from: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0034-71672015000500830&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167.2015680510i.

20. Galavote HS, Zandonade E, Garcia ACP, Freitas PSS, Seidl H, Contarato PC, et al. O trabalho do enfermeiro na atenção primária à saúde. Esc. Anna Nery. [internet]. 2016 Mar [cited 2020 Nov 12]; 20 (1): 90-98. Disponivel em: https://www.scielo.br/pdf/ean/v20n1/1414-8145-ean-20-01-0090.pdf doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1414-8145.20160013.

21. Celedônio RM, Fé MCM, Mendes AHL, Mendes AHL, Chaves TLF. Gestão do trabalho em unidades básicas de saúde. Rev. Enferm. UFPE online [Internet]. 2017 jan [cited 2019 may 27];11(supl.1):341-50.Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/revistaenfermagem/article/download/11914/14403 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5205/reuol.7995-69931-4-SM.1101sup201713

22. Lowen IMV, Peres AM, Crozeta K, Bernardino E, Beck CLC. Managerial nursing competencies in the expansion of the Family Health Strategy. Rev. esc. enferm. USP [Internet]. 2015 Dec [cited 2019 Sep 15]; 49(6): 964-970. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342015000600964&lng=en. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420150000600013.

23. Santos DS, Mishima SM, Merhy EE. Processo de trabalho na Estratégia de Saúde da Família: potencialidades da subjetividade do cuidado para reconfiguração do modelo de atenção. Ciênc. saúde coletiva [Internet]. 2018 Mar [cited 2019 Aug 09]; 23(3):861-870.Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232018000300861 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018233.03102016.

24. Toso Beatriz Rosana Gonçalves de Oliveira, Filippon Jonathan, Giovanella Ligia. Nurses' performance on primary care in the National Health Service in England. Rev. Bras. Enferm. [Internet]. 2016 Fev [cited 2019 Sep 23]; 69(1):182-191. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0034-71672016000100182&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167.2016690124i.

25. Caçador BS, Brito MJM, Moreira DA, Rezende LC, Vilela GS. Ser enfermeiro na estratégia de saúde da família: desafios e possibilidades. Rev. Min. Enferm. [Internet]. 2015 Jul [cited 2019 Oct 02];19(3):612-19.Disponível em: https://www.reme.org.br/artigo/detalhes/1027 http://www.dx.doi.org/10.5935/1415-2762.20150047

26. Girão ALA, Freitas CHA. Hypertensive patients in primary health care: access, connection and care involved in spontaneous demands. Rev. Gaúcha Enferm. [Internet]. 2016 May [cited 2019 Feb 19]; 37(2):e60015. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S1983-14472016000200408&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2016.02.60015.

27. Abreu TKK, Amendola F, Trovo MM. Relational technologies as instruments of care in the Family Health Strategy. Rev. Bras. Enferm. [Internet]. 2017 Out [cited 2019 Jan 16]; 70(5):981-987. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0034-71672017000500981&script=sci_abstract doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0337.

28. Kalichman AO, Ayres JRCM. Integralidade e tecnologias de atenção à saúde: uma narrativa sobre contribuições conceituais à construção do princípio da integralidade no SUS. Cad. Saúde Pública [Internet]. 2016 Aug [cited 2019 Mar 21] ; 32(8): e00183415. Disponivel em: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0102-311X2016000803001&script=sci_abstract&tlng=pt doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00183415.

29. Gutiérrez MGR de, Morais SCRV. Systematization of nursing care and the formation of professional identity. Rev. Bras. Enferm. [Internet]. 2017 Apr [cited 2020 Nov 23] ; 70 (2): 436-441. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672017000200436 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0515.

30. Silva JF, Fonseca DF, Silva J, Viegas SMF, Lanza FM. The daily work in the Family Health Strategy: between the real and the ideal. R. Enferm. Cent. O. Min. [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 29]; 9:e3488. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.19175/recom.v9i0.3488

31. Silva CA, Araujo MD. Programa de Residência Multiprofissional em Saúde: o que mostram as publicações. Rev. Saúde debate [Internet] 2020 Mar [cited 2020 Nov 22] 43(123) 1240-58 Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/pdf/sdeb/v43n123/0103-1104-sdeb-43-123-1240.pdf doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-1104201912320.

Published
2021-04-30
Section
Artigos Originas - Promoção da Saúde