Consumer perception in the State of São Paulo about beef produced in the Amazon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17765/2176-9168.2021v14n4e8262Keywords:
Amazon region, Consumers, Consumption of meat, PreferencesAbstract
The beef chain is one of the most relevant in Brazil's agribusiness. This relevance ranges from its economic importance to the role it plays in the culture and diet of Brazilians. The last few years have seen an expansion of cattle ranching in the Amazon region, raising an intense debate between cattle raisers, slaughterhouses, environmentalists, government officials, among others. Aspects related to the sustainability of this production are at the center of these controversies. However, in some ways, this debate has neglected the role of the consumer. Aiming to contribute to this discussion, this article investigated the perception of the São Paulo consumer about beef produced in the Amazônia. Thus, the article aimed, through a survey of 632 consumers from São Paulo, to understand how this production is perceived. Among the attributes of the product that were considered of greatest importance at the time of purchase, the appearance, expiration date and fat content of the meat stood out. On the other hand, the place of origin, animal welfare and sustainable production seals showed reduced importance as a determining factor for purchase for the interviewees. Through a structural equation model, it was verified that concerns with socio-environmental problems and animal welfare confer a negative perception on meat production in the Amazon region. Thus, it seems clear that the competitive strategies of agents in the Amazonia meat production chain must consider these negative aspects of consumer perception in their policies to value the product in national and international markets.References
ABIEC - Associação Brasileira das Indústrias Exportadoras de Carnes. Perfil da Pecuária no Brasil. Relatório Anual. São Paulo: Abiec, 2018. 22p.
GERBING, D.W.; ANDERSON, J.C. An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, v. 25, n. 2, p.186-192, 1988.
BARRETO, P.; PEREIRA, R.; BRANDÃO JR, A.; BAIMA, S. Os frigoríficos vão ajudar a zerar o desmatamento da Amazônia. Imazon. Instituto Centro da Vida, Belém, 2017.
BECKER, T.; BENNER, E.; GLITSCH, K. Consumer perception of fresh meat quality in Germany. British Food Journal, v. 102, p.246-266, 2000. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700010324763
BONAMIGO, A.; BONAMIGO, C. B. S. S.; MOLENTO, C. F. M. Atribuições da carne de frango relevantes ao consumidor: foco no bem-estar animal. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 41, p. 1044-1050, 2012. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000400029
BRISOLA, M. V.; DE CASTRO, A. M. G. O consumidor de carne bovina do Distrito Federal - Quanto paga e que atributos de valor o fariam pagar mais. Cadernos de Ciência & Tecnologia, v. 23, p.95-125, 2006.
CORDTS, A.; NITZKO, S.; SPILLER, A. Consumer response to negative information on meat consumption in Germany. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, v.17, p.83-106, 2014.
EGOLF, A.; SIEGRIST, M.; HARTMANN, C. How people's food disgust sensitivity shapes their eating and food behaviour. Appetite, v.127, p.28-36, 2018. Doi : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.04.014
ELLIES-OURY, M. P.; LEE, A.; JACOB, H.; HOCQUETT, J. F. Meat consumption–what French consumers feel about the quality of beef? Italian Journal of Animal Science, v. 18, n. 1, p. 646–656, 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2018.1551072
FAO - Organização das Nações Unidas para Alimentação e Agricultura. Food Outlook: biannual report on global food markets. Roma: Fao, 2018. 169p.
FONT-I-FURNOLS, M.; GUERRERO, L. Consumer preference, behavior and perception about meat and meat products: An overview. Meat science, v.98, p.361-371, 2014. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.06.025
GALUCHI, T. P. D.; ROSALES, F.P.; BATALHA, M. O. Management of socioenvironmental factors of reputational risk in the beef supply chain in the Brazilian Amazon region. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, p. 1-18, 2019.
GOODALL, J.; HUDSON, G.; MCAVOY, G. Nous sommes ce que nous mangeons. Paris: Actes Sud. 2012. 384 p.
GRUNERT, K. G. What's in a steak? A cross-cultural study on the quality perception of beef. Food Quality and Preference, v. 8, p.157-174, 1997. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(96)00038-9
HENCHION, M.; MCCARTHY, M.; RESCONI, V. C.; TROY, D. Meat consumption: Trends and quality matters. Meat Science, v.98, p.561-568, 2014. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.06.007
MAPA - MINISTÉRIO DA AGRICULTURA, PECUÁRIA E ABASTECIMENTO. Balança comercial do agronegócio – dezembro/2019. Disponível em: http://www.agricultura.gov.br/noticias/vendas-externas-do-agronegocio-somam-us-96-8-bilhoes-em-2019/copy_of_NotaaimprensaDezembro20191.pdf. Acesso em: 22 fev. 2020.
MILOŠEVIĆ, J.; ŽEŽELJ, I.; GORTON, M.; BARJOLLE, D. Understanding the motives for food choice in Western Balkan Countries. Appetite, v.58, p.205-214, 2012. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.09.012
RAIMUNDO, L.; BATALHA, M. Determinantes do comportamento do consumidor de carnes: proposta de modelo teórico. In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE ENGENHARIA DE PRODução, 32., 2012, Bento Gonçalves. Anais [...]. Bento Gonçalves (RS), 2012.
RAIMUNDO, L. M. B.; BATALHA, M. O. Mercado de carne suína na cidade de São Paulo: segmentos e estratégias. Gestão da Produção, v.22, p.391-403, 2015.
SATORRA, A.; PETER M. B. A Scaled Difference Chi-Square Test Statistic for Moment Structure Analysis. Psychometrik, v. 66, n. 4, p. 507-514, 2001.
SILVA, A. C.; OLIVEIRA NETO, O. J.; FIGUEIREDO, R. S.. Mercado brasileiro de carnes: transmissão de preços/Brazilian meat market: price transmission. Brazilian Journal of Development, v. 6, n. 3, p. 15870-15892, 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv6n3-456
SUN, S.; WANG, X. Promoting traceability for food supply chain with certification. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 217, p. 658–665, 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.296
TOMA, L.; MCVITTIE, A.; HUBBARD, C.; STOTT, A. W. A structural equation model of the factors influencing British consumers' behaviour toward animal welfare. Journal of Food Products Marketing, v. 17, p.261-278, 2011. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2011.548748
VENTURINI, S.; MEHMETOGLU, M. Plssem: A stata package for structural equation modeling with partial least squares. Journal of Statistical Software, v. 88, n. 1, 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v088.i08
VIEGAS, I.; SANTOS, J. M. L.; FONTES, M. A. Percepção dos Consumidores Relativamente à Carne de Bovino: cenários de escolha a partir de grupos de discussão. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, v. 53, p. 49-62, 2015. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1234-56781806-94790053s01004
VELHO, J. P.; BARCELLOS, J. O. J.; LENGLER, L.; ELIAS, S. A. A.; OLIVEIRA, T. E. D. Disposição dos consumidores porto-alegrenses à compra de carne bovina com certificação. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 38, p. 399-404, 2009. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982009000200025
WORLD ANIMAL PROTECTION. Consumo às cegas: percepção do consumidor sobre o bem-estar animal. São Paulo, 2016. 56p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
A Revista se reserva o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com o intuito de manter o padrão culto da língua, respeitando, porém, o estilo dos autores. As opiniões emitidas pelos autores são de sua exclusiva responsabilidade.Os direitos autorais pertencem exclusivamente aos autores. Os direitos de licenciamento utilizado pelo periódico é a licença Creative Commons Attribution
Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional. São permitidos o compartilhamento (cópia e distribuição do material em qualquer meio ou formato) e adaptação (remixar, transformar, e criar a partir do trabalho, mesmo para fins comerciais), desde que lhe atribuam o devido crédito pela criação original.