Questionnaire on teachers’ physical self-perception during school activities (P&Hscreen): development, validation, and reliability
Abstract
To construct and validate a questionnaire for assessing teachers’ self-perception of their posture, and their perception of students’ posture habits in different situations in the school environment. 7-step were performed for the construction of the questionnaire. The content validation strategy was judged by a panel of experts and the Validity Index (VI). Test-retest reliability was performed with teachers and measured by the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Kappa Coefficient (KC). Eleven experts with a doctorate, experience in education, and the field of posture participated in content validation and 40 teachers participated in test-retest reliability. VI measurements were all above 0.81, and the overall mean of ICC and KC were 0.94 and 0.91, respectively. This questionnaire was considered valid, reliable, and feasible with language understandable to teachers. It can be recommended for research in schools, and posture education programs, contributing to the prevention of inadequate posture habits and their consequences.References
1. de Sá-Caputo D da C, Sonza A, Bachur JA, et al. Development, validation and reliability of a questionnaire to evaluate changes on the level of physical exercises and psychological impact due to COVID-19 pandemic social distancing. Acta Biomedica 2020;91(3):1–9; doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i3.9888.
2. Souza AC de, Alexandre NMC, Guirardello E de B. Propriedades psicométricas na avaliação de instrumentos: avaliação da confiabilidade e da validade. Epidemiol Serv Saude 2017;26(3):649–659; doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022.
3. Noll M, Candotti CT, Vieira A. Instrumentos de avaliação da postura dinâmica: aplicabilidade ao ambiente escolar. Fisioterapia em Movimento 2013;26(1):203–217; doi: 10.1590/s0103-51502013000100023.
4. Crestani AH, de Moraes AB, de Souza APR. Content validation: Clarity/relevance, reliability and internal consistency of enunciative signs of language acquisition. Codas 2017;29(4):1–6; doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/201720160180.
5. Artino AR, La Rochelle JS, Dezee KJ, et al. Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87. Med Teach 2014;36(6):463–474; doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.889814.
6. Echevarría-Guanilo ME, Gonçalves N, Juceli Romanoski P. Psychometric properties of measurement instruments: Conceptual basis and evaluation methods- Part II. Texto e Contexto Enfermagem 2019;28(4):1–11; doi: 10.1590/1980-265X-TCE-2017-0311.
7. Portney, Leslie G.; Watkins MP; Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. 3rd ed. F.A. Davis Company: Philadelphia; 2015.
8. Gadotti I, Vieira E, Magee D. Importance and clarification of measurement properties in rehabilitation. Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia 2006;10(2):137–146; doi: 10.1590/s1413-35552006000200002.
9. Noll M, Tarragô Candotti C, Vieira A, et al. Back Pain and Body Posture Evaluation Instrument (BackPEI): Development, content validation and reproducibility. Int J Public Health 2013;58(4):565–572; doi: 10.1007/s00038-012-0434-1.
10. Schwertner DS, Oliveira RAN da S, Beltrame TS, et al. Questionnaire on body awareness of postural habits in young people: construction and validation. Fisioterapia em Movimento 2018;31(0):1–11; doi: 10.1590/1980-5918.031.ao16.
11. Ritter AL, Souza JL de. Instrumento para conhecimento da Percepção De Alunos Sobre A Postura Adotada No Ambiente Escolar – Posper. Movimento (ESEFID/UFRGS) 2006;12(3):227–241; doi: 10.22456/1982-8918.2917.
12. Noll M, Candotti CT, Da Rosa BN, et al. Layout for assessing dynamic posture: Development, validation, and reproducibility. Pediatric Physical Therapy 2016;28(4):435–444; doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000292.
13. da Rosa BN, Candotti CT, Pivotto LR, et al. Back Pain and Body Posture Evaluation Instrument for Children and Adolescents (BackPEI-CA): Expansion, Content Validation, and Reliability. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19(3); doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031398.
14. Erick PN, Smith DR. A systematic review of musculoskeletal disorders among school teachers. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011;12:13–17.
15. Korkmaz NC, Cavlak U, Telci EA. Musculoskeletal pain, associated risk factors and coping strategies in school teachers. Scientific Research and Essays 2011;6(3):649–657; doi: 10.5897/SRE10.1064.
16. Syazwan AI, Mohamad Azhar MM, Anita AR, et al. Poor sitting posture and a heavy schoolbag as contributors to musculoskeletal pain in children: An ergonomic school education intervention program. J Pain Res 2011;4:287–296; doi: 10.2147/jpr.s22281.
17. Lie Orita L, Vicentini de Oliveira D, Fernandes Franco M, et al. Estudos acerca da postura em crianças e adolescentes em fase escolar: relação com hábitos de vida. Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte 2018;16(2):93–100; doi: 10.36453/2318-5104.2018.v16.n2.p93.
18. Rantala L, Sala E, Kankare E. Teachers’ Working Postures and Their Effects on the Voice. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 2018;70(1):24–36; doi: 10.1159/000487593.
19. Franco VP, Edu G, Melo L De, et al. Postural Education in School: an analysis of the contents developed by Physical Education teachers in elementary school. 2020;(marzo):247–266.
20. Zhao J, Li J, Jia J. A study on posture-based teacher-student behavioral engagement pattern. Sustain Cities Soc 2021;67(November 2020):102749; doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102749.
21. Da Silva MT. A relação do corpo com o cotidiano da população adulta e suas implicações no que se refere ao contexto cultural na contemporaneidade. Revista Europeia de Estudos Artisticos 2010;1(3):94–104; doi: 10.37334/eras.v1i3.21.
22. Viçosa D, Viçosa C, Santana E, et al. Postural education as strategy for health promotion at school. Research, Society and Development 2020;9(2):1–23.
23. Mélo ES de, Neves R da F, Lima Filho LMA, et al. Quality of neuropediatric physiotherapy services: validation of instrument based on caregivers’ perception. Saúde e Pesquisa 2020;13(3):549–559; doi: 10.17765/2176-9206.2020v13n3p549-559.
24. Oliveira DM de, Jesus PR de, Zucco B dos S, et al. Development, validation and use of educational material on the correct storage of medicine. Saúde e Pesquisa 2020;13(3):461–473; doi: 10.17765/2176-9206.2020v13n3p461-473.
25. Halek M, Holle D, Bartholomeyczik S. Development and evaluation of the content validity, practicability and feasibility of the Innovative dementia-oriented Assessment system for challenging behaviour in residents with dementia. BMC Health Serv Res 2017;17(1); doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2469-8.
26. Zamanzadeh V, Ghahramanian A, Rassouli M, et al. Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication. J Caring Sci 2015;4(2):165–178; doi: 10.15171/jcs.2015.017.
27. Kottner J, Audigé L, Brorson S, et al. Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64(1):96–106; doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002.
28. Cicchetti D V. Guidelines, Criteria, and Rules of Thumb for Evaluating Normed and Standardized Assessment Instruments in Psychology. Psychol Assess 1994;6(4):284–290; doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284.
29. Chong EYL, Chan AHS. Subjective health complaints of teachers from primary and secondary schools in Hong Kong. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 2010;16(1):23–39; doi: 10.1080/10803548.2010.11076825.
30. Vidal J, Borràs PA, Ponseti FJ, et al. Effects of a postural education program on school backpack habits related to low back pain in children. European Spine Journal 2013;22(4):782–787; doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2558-7.
31. Dullien S, Grifka J, Jansen P. Cluster-randomized, controlled evaluation of a teacher led multi factorial school based back education program for 10 to 12-year old children. BMC Pediatr 2018;18(1):1–10; doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1280-y.
32. Junior F, Paz C, Lopes R. Dor e desvios posturais em crianças e adolescentes: uma revisão bibliográfica. Revista das Ciências da Saúde e Ciências aplicadas do Oeste Baiano-Higia 2021;4(1):1–23.
33. Rayhan RU, Zheng Y, Uddin E, et al. Administer and collect medical questionnaires with Google documents: a simple, safe, and free system. Appl Med Inform 2013;33(3):12–21.
34. Roy D, Tripathy S, Kumar S, et al. Study of knowledge, attitude, anxiety & perceived mental healthcare need in Indian. Asian Journal of Psychiatry journal 2020;51(January):1–8.
35. Perez-Alba E, Nuzzolo-Shihadeh L, Espinosa-Mora JE, et al. Use of self-administered surveys through QR code and same center telemedicine in a walk-in clinic in the era of COVID-19. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2020;27(6):985–986; doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa054.
36. Delgado D, Quintana FW, Perez G, et al. Personal safety during the covid-19 pandemic: Realities and perspectives of healthcare workers in latin America. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17(8):1–8; doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082798.
37. Pedreira RBS, Rocha SV, Santos CA Dos, et al. Content validity of the Geriatric Health Assessment Instrument. Einstein (Sao Paulo) 2016;14(2):158–177; doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082016AO3455.
Copyright (c) 2023 Saúde e Pesquisa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
A submissão de originais para a revista Saúde e Pesquisa implica na transferência da Carta Concessão de Direitos Autorais, pelos autores, dos direitos de publicação digital para a revista após serem informados do aceite de publicação.A Secretaria Editorial irá fornecer da um modelo de Carta de Concessão de Direitos Autorais, indicando o cumprimento integral de princípios éticos e legislação específica. Os direitos autorais dos artigos publicados nesta revista são de direito do autor, com direitos da revista sobre a primeira publicação. Os autores somente poderão utilizar os mesmos resultados em outras publicações, indicando claramente a revista Saúde e Pesquisa como o meio da publicação original. Em virtude de tratar-se de um periódico de acesso aberto, é permitido o uso gratuito dos artigos, principalmente em aplicações educacionais e científicas, desde que citada a fonte. A Saúde e Pesquisa adota a licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
A revista se reserva o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua e a credibilidade do veículo. Respeitará, no entanto, o estilo de escrever dos autores. Alterações, correções ou sugestões de ordem conceitual serão encaminhadas aos autores, quando necessário. Nesses casos, os artigos, depois de adequados, deverão ser submetidos a nova apreciação. As opiniões emitidas pelos autores dos artigos são de sua exclusiva responsabilidade.
