Use of a public park to physical activity practice: prospective study in a small city from the South of Brazil

Keywords: Epidemiology, Environment, Motor activity, Public health

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the stability, over a 12-month period, in the use and non-use of a public park to physical activity (PA) practice among adults from Canguçu (RS, Brazil). A second aim was to evaluate the association of this stability with sociodemographic, behavioral, nutritional and health variables. Through an accidental sampling process, 109 users and 109 non-users of the public park were selected and answered a questionnaire. About 12 months after the first data collection, the subjects were searched and answered the same questionnaire. The association between the status of use of the park and the independent variables was assessed by the Chi-square test. Most participants were male (54.1%) and aged between 18 and 29 years (77.5%). As for the status of use of the public park, 70.7% of users continued to attend the park and 34.3% of the non-users started using the park. Public policies designed to promote physical activity should take these results into account, which can help to increase the number of individuals practicing PA in the park, as well as practice of those who already use it.

Author Biographies

Igor Retzlaff Doring, Universidade Federal de Pelotas - UFPel
Master´s degree in the Postgraduate Program in Physical Education at the Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas RS Brazil.
Eduardo Lucia Caputo, Universidade Federal de Pelotas - UFPel
Doctor´s degree in the Postgraduate Program in Physical Education at the Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas RS Brazil.
Guilherme da Fonseca Vilela, Universidade Federal de Pelotas - UFPel
Master´s degree in the Postgraduate Program in Physical Education at the Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas RS Brazil.
Marcelo Cozzensa da Silva, Universidade Federal de Pelotas - UFPel
Professors in Postgraduate Program in Physical Education at the Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas RS Brazil.
Felipe Fossati Reichert, Universidade Federal de Pelotas - UFPel
Professors in Postgraduate Program in Physical Education at the Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas RS Brazil.

References

1. Hallal P, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W. e Ekelund U. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. The Lancet. 2012.

2. Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. The Lancet. 2012;380.

3. Wen CP, Wai JP, Tsai MK, Yang YC, Cheng TY, Lee MC, et al. Minimum amount of physical activity for reduced mortality and extended life expectancy: a prospective cohort study. The Lancet. 2011;378.

4. WHO (World Health Organization). Insufficient physical activity. Geneva: WHO; 2015.

5. Bedimo-Rung AL; Mowen AJ, Cohen DA. The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: A conceptual model. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2005.

6. Kaczynski AT, Henderson KA. Environmental correlates of physical activity: a review of evidence about parks and recreation. Leisure Sciences. 2007;29(4):315-54.

7. Coombes E, Jones AP, Hillsdon M. The relationship of physical activity and overweight to objectively measured green space accessibility and use. Soc Sci Med. 2010.

8. Veitch J, Bola K, Crawford D, Abbott L, Salmon J. Is park visitation associated with leisure-time and transportation physical activity? Prev Med. 2013.

9. Fermino RC, Reis RS, Cassou AC. Fatores individuais e ambientais associados ao uso de parques e praças por adultos de Curitiba-PR, Brasil. Rev Bras Cineantropometria e Desemp Humano. 2012;14(4):377-89.

10. Fermino RC, Reis SR, Hallal P, Farias Junior JC. Perceived environment and public open space use: a study with adults from Curitiba, Brazil. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10(1):1.

11. Florindo AA, Salvador EP, Reis RS. Physical activity and its relationship with perceived environment among adults living in a region of low socioeconomic level. J Phys Act Health. 2013; 10(4):563-71.

12. Lopes AAS, Lanzoni AN, Hino AAF, Rodriguez-Añez CR, Reis RS. Perceived neighborhood environment and physical activity among high school students from Curitiba, Brazil. Rev. bras. Epidemiol. 2014;17(4):938-53.

13. Farias Junior JC, Reis RS, Hallal PC. Atividade física e fatores psicossociais e ambientais em adolescentes do Nordeste do Brasil. Cad. Saúde Pública. 2014;30(5):941-51.

14. Fermino RC, Hallal PC, Reis RS. Frequência de uso de parques e prática de atividades físicas em adultos de Curitiba, Brasil. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2017;23(4).

15. Barreta E, Barreta M, Peres KG. Nível de atividade física e fatores associados em adultos no Município de Joaçaba, Santa Catarina, Brasil. Cad. Saúde Pública. 2007;23(7):1595-602.

16. IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica. Censo populacional 2017. Rio de Janeiro; 2017 [acesso em 2019 jun. 12]. Disponível em: http://www.ibge.gov.br

17. Reis R,Vieira, J, Petroski, E. (2002). Escala de autopercepção do ambiente para a realização de atividades físicas. Rev Bras Ativ Fís Saúde. 2002;7:14-2.

18. Silva DAS, Petroski El, Reis RS. Barreiras e facilitadores de atividades físicas em frequentadores de parques públicos. Motriz. 2009;15(2):219-27.

19. Collet C, Chiaradia BM, Reis RS, Do Nascimento JV. Fatores determinantes para a realização de atividades físicas em parque urbano de Florianópolis. Rev Bras Ativ Fís e Saud. 2012;13(1):15-23.

20. Scholz J, Klein MC, Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H. Training induces changes in the architecture of white matter. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12(11):1370-71.

21. Florindo AA, Salvador EP, Reis RS, Guimarães VV. Percepção do ambiente e prática de atividade física em adultos residente sem região de baixo nível socioeconômico. Rev Saúde Pública 2011;45(2):302-10.

22. Kruger G, Duarte CP, Santos CL. Atividade física na fase da meia-idade: motivos de adesão e de continuidade. Rev Movim. 2001;7(15):75-88.

Published
2021-12-20
Section
Artigos Originas - Promoção da Saúde