La carga de la prueba en el arbitraje
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17765/2176-9184.2024v24n3.e13445Palabras clave:
Carga de la Prueba, Arbitraje, Common Law, Civil Law, Actori Incumbit ProbatioResumen
El presente articulo tiene como objetivo establecer qué regla debe aplicarse en el ámbito arbitral en cuanto a la carga de la prueba, dada la importancia de la producción de pruebas en este método alternativo de resolución de disputas. El objetivo principal es comprender las reglas y definir la más adecuada para la aplicación. Se utilizó el método deductivo, basado en la revisión bibliográfica de textos principiológicos y manuales de arbitraje, además del análisis cualitativo de decisiones de anulación de laudos arbitrales debido a la distribución de la carga de la prueba. Como resultado, se establecieron indicadores para la decisión sobre las reglas de la carga de la prueba. Primero, la carga de la prueba se deriva del Principio del Debido Proceso Legal. Segundo, se analizan los efectos de la carga de la prueba en el procedimiento arbitral. Tercero, se evalúa la aplicabilidad de la regla Actori Incumbit Probatio. Cuarto, hay una necesidad de estudio comparativo entre las tradiciones del common y civil law. Por último, se concluye que la aplicación de la regla actori incubit probatio es la más adecuada para el procedimiento arbitral, reduciendo los riesgos de anulación del laudo arbitral.
Citas
AAA COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION RULES, R-32(a). Available in: https://www.adr.org/sites/default/files/CommercialRules_Web.pdf. Accessed in: 13 jul. 2024.
ALMEIDA, Pedro Francisco da Silva. Burden and Standards of Proof in International Arbitration. Orientador: Philipp K. Wagner. 2020. 67 f. Dissertação (International Dispute Resolution L.L.M.) - Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 2020.
AMARAL, Guilherme Rizzo. Burden of Proof and Adverse Inferences in International Arbitration: Proposal for an Inference Chart. Journal of International Arbitration. Kluwer Law International. Volume 35. 2018.
AMARAL, Paulo Ostemark. Provas: Atipicidade, Liberdade e Instrumentalidade. Col. Lebman – 2ª. Ed. 2017.
AUSTRIA. Austrian Code Of Civil Procedure (Zivilprozessordnung) 1983, Sections 226(1) and 239(1). Available in < https://e-justice.europa.eu/content_taking_of_evidence-76-at-en.do?member=1> Accessed in: 13 jul. 2024.
BLAVI, Vial SCHARF MP, Day M. The International Court of Justice’s treatment of circumstantial evidence and adverse inferences. Chicago Journal of International Law. 2012.
BLAVI, Francisco. VIAL, Gonzalo. The Burden of proof in international commercial arbitration: are we allowed to adjust the scales? Hastings Int’l & Cino. L. Rev. 41.
BHUSHAN A. Standard of burden of proof in international commercial arbitration: is there a bright line rule? American Review of International Arbitration. 2014.
BORN, Gary B. International Arbitration: Cases and Materials, 2a Ed., 2014. Kluwer Law International.
CAM-CCBC Arbitration Rules. Available in <https://ccbc.org.br/cam-ccbc-centro-arbitragem-mediacao/resolucao-de-disputas/arbitragem/regulamento-de-arbitragem-2022> Accessed in 13 jul. 2024
CARMONA, Carlos Alberto. Arbitragem e Processo: um comentário à Lei n. 9.307/96. 3a edição. São Paulo: Atlas, 2009.
COASE, Ronald. The Problem of the Social Costs. Journal of Law and Economics, 1960.
DWYER, Stephen I. Presumptions and Burden of Proof. Loyola Law Review, v. 21, n. 2, p. 377-404, Spring 1975.
FEUTRILL, M.; RUBINS, N. Preparation of expert evidence in international commercial arbitration: Practical aspects. International Business Law Journal 20. p. 307-332.
FRANCK, Susan D. et. Al. Precision and legitimacy in international arbitration: empirical insights from ICCA. 2014. Kluwer Law Arbitration.
FRANCK, Susan D.; FREDA, James et al., International Arbitration: Demographics, Precision and Justice. in Albert Jan Van den Berg (ed), Legitimacy: Myths, Realities, Challenges, ICCA Congress Series. vol. 18 ICCA & Kluwer Law International, 2015. p. 33 – 122.
FRANCE, French Code Of Civil Procedure (Code De Procédure Civil) 2007, Article 9. Available in <https://e-justice.europa.eu/content_service_of_documents-371-fr-en.do?member=1> Accessed in 13 jul. 2024.
HANOTIAU, Bernard. Written Evidence and Discovery in International Arbitration New Issues and Tendencies. Edited by Teresa Giovannini and Alexis Mourre. International Chamber of Commerce, 2009.
HKIAC Arbitration Rules, Article 22.1 Available in <https://www.hkiac.org/arbitration/rules-practice-notes/administered-arbitration-rules/hkiac-administered-2018-1#22?> Accessed in 13 jul. 2024.
IBA RULES ON THE TAKING OF EVIDENCE IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION, approved in 17.12.2020.
ICSID Case no ARB/02/18, Award dated of July 26, 2007 ICSID Case no ARB/02/13, Award dated of January 31, 2006. ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12. Annulment Procedure.
ITALY. Italian Code Of Civil Procedure (Codice Di Procedura Civile Italiano) 2016, Articles 228 and 229. Available in < https://www.altalex.com/documents/codici-altalex/2015/01/02/codice-di-procedura-civile> Accessed in 13 jul. 2024.
KREINDLER, Richard. Practice and Procedure Regarding Proof: The Need for More Precision. In: VAN DEN BERG, Albert Jan (ed.). Legitimacy: Myths, Realities, Challenges. ICCA Congress Series, vol 18. ICCA & Kluwer Law International, 2015. p. 164
LANDOLT, Phillip; NEAL, Barbara Reeves. Chapter 5: Burden and Standard of Proof in Competition Law Matters Arising in International Arbitration. In: BLANKE, Gordon; LANDOLT, Phillips (eds). EU and US Antitrust Arbitration: A Handbook for Practitioners, 2011. p. 155 – 178.
LEMES, Selma M. Ferreira. Arbitragem: Princípios Jurídicos Fundamentais, Direito Brasileiro e Comparado. Revista de La Corte Espanhola de Arbitraje. v. 7, p. 31-57, 1991.
______. Arbitragem: Princípios Jurídicos Fundamentais, Direito Brasileiro e Comparado. Revista de Informação Legislativa. v. 115, p. 441-468, jul/set. 1992. Senado Federal.
LOPES, Paulo Guilherme de Mendonça. Algumas observações sobre a produção de provas nas arbitragens nacionais e internacionais. Revista de Arbitragem e Mediação, v. 56, p. 95-110, 2008.
MAKARIUS, Vit. The Nature of the Burden and Standard of Proof in International Commercial Arbitration. Czech & Central Eur. Y. B. of Arb., n. 54, 2013.
MARGHITOLA, Reto. Document Production in International Arbitration. Kluwer Law Arbitration 2015.
MAROSSI, Ali Z. Shifting the Burden of Proof in the Practice of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal. Journal of Transnational Law, v. 28, 2011.
O'MALLEY, Nathan. The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008.
O’MALLEY, Nathan, Lloyd H. Rules of evidence in international arbitration: an annotated guide. London: Informa; 2012;2013, p. 212.
RODRIGUEZ, Francisco, ICCA 2014. Standard of Proof A Plea for Precision or an Unnecessary Remedy? 10 April 2014, Available in <http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2014/04/10/icca-2014-standard-of- proof-a-plea-for-precision-or-an-unnecessary-rem3edy/ > Accessed March 23th 2020.
RODRIGUEZ, Francisco. ICCA 2014. Standard of Proof: A Plea for Precision or an Unnecessary Remedy? 10 abril 2014. Avaliable in: < https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2014/04/10/icca-2014-standard-of-proof-a-plea-for-precision-or-an-unnecessary-remedy/> Acessed in: 13 jul. 2024
RULES ON THE EFFICIENT CONDUCT OF PROCEEDINGS IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION, approved in december of 2018. Available in < https://praguerules.com/upload/medialibrary/9dc/9dc31ba7799e26473d92961d926948c9.pdf> Acessed in 13 jul. 2024.
SOURGENS, Fréderic Gilles; DUGGAL, Kabir; LAIRD, Ian A. Part II Burden and Standard of Proof in International Investment Arbitration. In: Evidence in International Investment Arbitration. 2018.
UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. Available in < https://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/arb-rules/arb-rules.pdf> Accessed in 13 jul. 2024.
UNITED NATIONS. United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sales of Gods. Viena. 1980. Available in <https://cisg-online.org/Text-of-the-Convention> Accessed in 13 jul. 2024.
World Bank Group. Updated background paper on annulment for the administrative council of ICSID. Washington, D.C. May 5, 2016. Available in <https://icsid.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/Background%20Report%20on%20Annulment_English.pdf> Accessed in 13 jul. 2024.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
A Revista se reserva o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com o intuito de manter o padrão culto da língua, respeitando, porém, o estilo dos autores. As opiniões emitidas pelos autores são de sua exclusiva responsabilidade.
Os direitos autorais pertencem exclusivamente aos autores. Os direitos de licenciamento utilizado pelo periódico é a licença Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional. São permitidos o compartilhamento (cópia e distribuição do material em qualquer meio ou formato) e adaptação (remixar, transformar, e criar a partir do trabalho, mesmo para fins comerciais), desde que lhe atribuam o devido crédito pela criação original.
