The privatization of human rights from the building of the post-democratic state of law in the european legal perception
Abstract
It is research on the European legal system on the relationship of the constitutional discourse on democracy to the protection of human rights from a socioeconomic analysis of law. Thus, as main objectives, they reflect two questions: what is the relationship between the constitutional order and the emergence of economic policies in contemporary democratic societies? and how and to what extent does constitutional design contribute to economic policy in contemporary liberal democratic states? Thus, from the deductive hypothetical research method, it became necessary to understand the ideational-discursive domain of discourses, paradigms, and competing interpretations of an ideal state, where the argument is verified that socioeconomic democracies emerge because a coalition of interventions that promote the neoliberal understanding of the constitution has taken over this discursive domain of constitutional interpretation, both in the state apparatus and in the public sphere. Thus, among the main conclusions of this research, it appears that the crisis of democratic representation and its relationship with the constitutional conception represent ideational and materialistic aspects, that is, economists promote, reinforce and support interpretations and constitutional discourses that serve themselves and that reinforce the political logic of oligarchic wealth accumulation while suppressing the politics of peaceful dissent and distributive justice.References
COHEN, Miguel Centeno e Joseph. "The Arc of Neoliberalism," Annual Review of Sociology 38 (2012).
ACHARYA, Amitav. "How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism", International Organization 58 (2004), 239-75;
ALBERT, Mathias; BUZAN, Barry, and Michael Zürn (eds) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 112-31.
ALBERTUS, Michael; MENALDO, Victor. "The Political Economy of Autocratic Constitutions", em Tom Ginsburg e Alberto Simpser (eds), Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes (Nova Iorque: Cambridge University Press, 2014).
BALKIN, Jack. Living Constitutionalism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011).
BARROSO, Luis Roberto. Countermajoritarian, Representative, and Enlightened: The roles of constitutional tribunals in contemporary democracies. Revista Direito e Práxis. V. 9, n. 4, p. 02 a 34.
BAUMAN, Zigmund. Modernidade líquida. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2001.
BECK, Ulrich. "The Cosmopolitan State: Redefining Power in the Global Age," International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 18 (2006), 143-59;
BECK, Ulrich; GRANDE, Edgar. "Varieties of Second Modernity: The Cosmopolitan Turn in Social and Political Theory and Research", The British Journal of Sociology 61 (2010), 409-43;
BENHABIB, Seyla. "Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy by Juergen Habermas," The American Political Science Review 91 (1997), 725- 6;
BRANCATI, Dawn. "Democratic Authoritarianism: Origins and Effects", Annual Review of Political Science 17 (2014), 315.
BROWN, Wendy. "American Nightmare: Neoliberalism, Neoconservatism, and De-Democratization", Political Theory 34 (2006), 690-714;
CAMERON, David. "Prime Minister's Speech on Life Chances," Governo do Reino Unido: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/prime-ministers-speech-on-life-chances. Acesso em 20 ago 2023.
CASARA, Rubens. Estado pós democrático: neo-obscurantismo e gestão dos indesejáveis. 1. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização brasileira, 2017.
CASTRO, Lorenna Roberta Barbosa; SIQUEIRA, Dirceu Pereira. Minoria feminina e constituições republicanas brasileiras: análise de 1891 a 1988 pela inclusão das mulheres. Revista Argumenta, n. 33, p. 361-555, 2020.
COLBY, Thomas. "Living Originalism", Duke Law Journal 59 (2009), 239- 307; Wil Waluchow, 20 de dezembro de 2017, "Constitutionalism", editado por Edward Zalta, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 9 de maio de 2019.
DAVIES, William. The Limits of Neoliberalism: Authority, Sovereignty and the Logic of Competition (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2014), p. 6.
ELKINS, Zachary; GINSBURG, Tom; Melton, James. "The Content of Authoritarian Constitutions," in Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes, Alberto Simpser e Tom Ginsburg (eds) (Nova Iorque: Cambridge University Press, 2014);
FORBATH, William. "Habermas's Constitution: A History, Guide, and Critique," Review of International Political Economy 23 (1998), 969-1016;
GAVISON, Ruth. "What Belongs in a Constitution?", Constitutional Political Economy 13 (2002), 89-105;
GILL, Stephen. "Constitutionalizing Inequality and the Clash of Globalizations", International Studies Review 4 (2002), 47-65;
GINSBURG, Tom; MOUSTAFA, Tamir, "Introduction: the Functions of Courts in Authoritarian Politics", em Tom Ginsburg e Tamir Moustafa (eds), Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes (Nova Iorque: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 4-17.
GORDON, Arlen. "Aristotle and the problem of oligarchic harm: Insights para a democracia". Revista Europeia de Teoria Política 64 (2017), 1-22.
GORDON, Scott. Controlling the state: Constitutionalism from ancient Athens to today (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009).
HABERMAS, Juergen. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996);
HARVEY, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism (Nova Iorque: Oxford University Press, 2005), p. 2.
HIRSCHL, Ran. "The Strategic Foundations of Constitutions", in Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions, Denis Galligan e Mila Versteeg (eds) (Nova Iorque e Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), p. 157.
HYDE, Susan. The Pseudo-Democrat's Dilemma: Why Election Observation Became an International Norm (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2011);
KRAUNAK, Robert. "Hobbes's Behemoth and the Argument for Absolutism", American Political Science Review 76(4) (1982), 837-47;
LÊDO, Ana Paula Ruiz Silveira; SABO, Isabela Cristina; AMARAL, Ana Zuim Mattos do. Existencialidade humana: o negócio jurídico na visão pós-moderna. civilistica.com, v. 6, n. 1, p. 1-22, 6 ago. 2017.
LOUREIRO, João Carlos. A “porta da memória”:(pós?) constitucionalismo, estado (pós?) social,(pós?) democracia e (pós?) capitalismo: contributos para uma “dogmática da escassez”. Revista Estudos do Século XX. Nº 13. Universidade de Coimbra (2013).
MACCORMICK, Neil. Argumentação jurídica e teoria do direito. (W. Barcellos trad.) São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2006.
MATTEI, Ugo; NADER, Laura. Plunder: When the Rule of Law is Illegal (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2008), p. 31
MCADAM, Doug; TARROW, Sidney; TILLY, Charles. Dynamics of Contention (Nova Iorque: Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 5, 7.
MUNGER, Frank. "Constitutional Reform, Legal Consciousness, and Citizen Participation in Thailand," Cornell International Law Journal 40 (2007), 455-75;
OKLOPCIC, Zoran., "Imagined Ideologies: Populist Figures, Liberalist Projections, and the Horizons of Constitutionalism", German Law Journal 20(2) (2019), p. 219.
OLSON, Mancur, "Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development", American Political Science Review 87 (1993), 567-76.
PISTOR, Katharina. The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2019).
PLATT, Spencer. "Poll: Fewer Americans Blame Poverty on the Poor," NBC News: https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/in-plain-sight/poll-fewer-americans-blame-pov-erty-poor-n136051 . Acesso em 19 ago 2023.
PLEHWE, Dieter; WALPEN, Bernhard; NEUNHOFFER, Gisela. Neoliberal Hegemony: A Global Critique (Abingdon: Routledge, 2006);
RAPLEY, John. Globalization and Inequality: Neoliberalism's Downward Spiral (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2004);
RISSE, Thomas. "'Let's Argue!': Communicative Action in World Politics", International Organization 54 (2000), 1-39;
SALDANHA, Rodrigo Róger, & OLIVEIRA, José Sebastião. Políticas públicas, saúde mental e direitos de personalidade: a retórica operacional entre o estado e a iniciativa privada para enfrentamento ao suicídio no brasil. Revista Direitos Sociais E Políticas Públicas (UNIFAFIBE), 7(1), 522–560, 2020.
SALDANHA, Rodrigo Róger.; OLIVEIRA, José Sebastião. De. Críticas ao estado pós-democrático de direito na literatura de José Saramago: a relativização dos direitos da personalidade do homem duplicado. Novos estudos jurí¬dicos, itajaí¬ (sc), v. 27, n. 3, p. 530–551, 2022.
SALDANHA, Rodrigo Róger; OLIVEIRA, José Sebastião de. A influência privatista da proteção de dados pessoais na Europa como referência para proteção de dados e direitos de personalidade no brasil. Revista Jurídica (FURB), [S.l.], v. 26, p. E10036, set. 2022.
SALDANHA, Rodrigo Róger; OLIVEIRA, José Sebastião de. A QUARTA EXPRESSÃO DOS DIREITOS DE PERSONALIDADE: o conjunto informativo digital como um novo conceito no Direito Civil contemporâneo. Revista Húmus, 12(37), 2022.
SALDANHA, Rodrigo Róger; OLIVEIRA, José Sebastião de. O algoritmo como um novo conceito de intimidade e a proteção aos direitos da personalidade vulneráveis em padrões comportamentais sequenciais no âmbito digital. Revista Jurídica Unicuritiba. Curitiba.V.4, n.66 p.637 – 665.
SALDANHA, Rodrigo Róger; OLIVEIRA, José. A supremacia do poder econômico em detrimento a proteção de dados e direitos de personalidade. Revista do Mestrado em Direito da UCB, p. 142-162, 2020.
SIMMONS, Beth. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics (Cambridge e Nova York: Cambridge University Press, 2009).
SIQUEIRA, Dirceu Pereira; AMARAL, Sérgio Tibiriçá (Ed.). Direitos Humanos: Un Olhar Sob O Viés Da Inclusão Social. Boreal Editora, 2012.
SIQUEIRA, Dirceu Pereira; LARA, Fernanda Corrêa Pavesi; SOUZA, Bruna Carolina de. Os direitos humanos e a proteção aos seus defensores: análise à luz da salvaguarda dos direitos de personalidade. Revista Direitos Sociais e Políticas Públicas (UNIFAFIBE)-ISSN, p. 2318-5732, 2020.
SIQUEIRA, Dirceu Pereira; PICCIRILLO, Miguel Belinati. Direitos fundamentais: a evolução histórica dos direitos humanos, um longo caminho. Âmbito Jurídico, Rio Grande, XII, n. 61, p. 06, 2009.
SLATER, Dan. Ordering Power: Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia (Nova Iorque: Cambridge University Press, 2010);
SPRINGBORG, Patricia. "Hobbes's Biblical Beasts: Leviathan and Behemoth", Review of International Political Economy 23 (1995), 353-75;
TANSEL, Cemal Burak, "Authoritarian Neoliberalism: Towards a New Research Agenda", em Cemal Burak Tansel (ed.), States of Discipline: Authoritarian Neoliberalism and the Contested Reproduction of Capitalist Order (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2017).
TILLY, Charles; TARROW, Sidney. Contentious Politics, 2ª ed. (Nova Iorque: Oxford University Press, 2015).
TUCKER, Avizier. "Pre-Emptive Democracy: Tendências Oligárquicas na Democracia Deliberativa". Estudos Políticos 56 (2008), 133.
TUSHNET, Mark. "Authoritarian Constitutionalism," in Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes, Tom Ginsburg e Alberto Simpser (eds) (Nova Iorque: Cambridge University Press, 2013)
VERSTEEG, Mila; ZACKIN, Emily. "Constitutions Un-Entrenched: Toward an Alternative Theory of Constitutional Design", American Political Science Review 110(4) (2016), 657- 74.
WEBER, Max. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, em H.H. Gerth e C. Wright Mills (eds) (Londres e Nova Iorque: Routledge, 2009).
WINTERS, Jeffrey. Oligarchy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), p. 6.
ZIMMERMANN, Lisbeth. "Same Same or Different? Norm Diffusion Between Resistance, Compliance, and Localization in Post-Conflict States," International Studies Perspectives 17(1) (2015), 98-115.
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
A Revista se reserva o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com o intuito de manter o padrão culto da língua, respeitando, porém, o estilo dos autores. As opiniões emitidas pelos autores são de sua exclusiva responsabilidade.
Os direitos autorais pertencem exclusivamente aos autores. Os direitos de licenciamento utilizado pelo periódico é a licença Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional. São permitidos o compartilhamento (cópia e distribuição do material em qualquer meio ou formato) e adaptação (remixar, transformar, e criar a partir do trabalho, mesmo para fins comerciais), desde que lhe atribuam o devido crédito pela criação original.
